MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf01901104

Медицинская библиотека · International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 1996

The contribution of urethrocystoscopy to evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunction in women.

Cundiff G W, Bent A E

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The aim of this study was to determine whether the evaluation of lower urinary dysfunction with urodynamics and urethrocystoscopy provides unique information that is missed by urodynamics alone. Eighty-four women underwent multichannel urodynamics and urethrocystoscopy. Retrospective analysis included evaluation of the relationships between lower urinary tract lesions and risk factors using chi2 and Fisher's exact tests. Urethrocystoscopic findings changed the diagnosis and management in 6 patients. New urethrocystoscopic findings included papillary transitional-cell carcinoma, cystitis glandularis, an intravesical suture and a urethral diverticulum. Clinical parameters were not predictive of these findings. Urethrocystoscopic findings also contributed to the final diagnosis in 10 patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Considered alone, maximum urethral closure pressure < or =20 cmH2O had a sensitivity of only 20% and a positive predictive value of 40% for this diagnosis. Urodynamics without urethrocystoscopy would have missed important diagnoses in 19% of women. Urethrocystoscopy and urodynamics complement one another, and both have a role in the evaluation of women with lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Для цитирования: Cundiff G W, Bent A E. The contribution of urethrocystoscopy to evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunction in women.. International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction. 1996. DOI: 10.1007/bf01901104.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.