MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/03635465241293743

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of sports medicine · 2025

Patient-Reported Outcomes of Bicruciate Multiligament Versus Single Cruciate Multiligament Knee Injuries.

Trøan Ingrid, Bere Tone, Holm Inger, LaPrade Robert F, Engebretsen Lars, Moatshe Gilbert

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are heterogeneous, and bicruciate knee ligament injuries are considered a serious form of this injury. The current literature tends not to distinguish between single and bicruciate MLKI when reporting outcomes.

PURPOSE: To investigate patient-reported outcomes after surgical treatment of MLKI comparing single cruciate MLKI with bicruciate MLKI. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of different factors on patient-reported outcomes after surgery.

STUDY

DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study was designed as a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients who underwent surgical treatment for MLKI at a single level 1 trauma center between January 2013 and December 2020 were included in this study. Patient-reported outcomes included the Tegner score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey (KOOS), and a visual analog scale for pain.

RESULTS

Of the 191 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 124 (65%) agreed to participate and had a complete data set with a follow-up time at a mean 74 ± 27 months. Patients with single cruciate MLKI (type I) had significantly higher scores for IKDC (P = .007), Lysholm (P = .012), KOOS Pain (P = .04), KOOS Activities of Daily Living (P = .01), KOOS Sport and Recreation (P = .005), KOOS Quality of Life (P = .04), KOOS4 (which considers the subscales of Pain, Symptoms, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life) (P = .01), Tegner (P = .04), and visual analog scale for pain during activity (P = .004) when compared with patients with bicruciate MLKI (type II-type IV). Furthermore, age was significantly associated with a lower IKDC (P = .001), and an increased severity of injury was significantly associated with IKDC (P = .015), KOOS4 (P = .022), and Lysholm (P = .029) scores.

CONCLUSION

MLKIs involving a single cruciate ligament had significantly higher patient-reported postoperative outcome measures compared with bicruciate MLKIs. Age and type of injury were important predictors for outcomes. Patients presenting with dislocated knees had lower patient-reported outcomes; however, there was no significant difference in outcomes between bicruciate MLKIs and patients presenting with dislocated knees.

Для цитирования: Trøan Ingrid, Bere Tone, Holm Inger, LaPrade Robert F, Engebretsen Lars, Moatshe Gilbert. Patient-Reported Outcomes of Bicruciate Multiligament Versus Single Cruciate Multiligament Knee Injuries.. The American journal of sports medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/03635465241293743.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.