BMC medical genomics · 2026
Designing inclusive newborn sequencing research: insights from parents in underrepresented communities.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Del Rosario Maya C, Walmsley Sheyenne A, Harrison Barbara W, Stephens Crystal T, Zettler Bethany, Rivera-Cruz Greysha, Agrawal Priyal, Brower Amy, Chigbu Stephanie, Christensen Kurt D, Genetti Casie A, Givens Richetta, Gold Nina B, Reeves Inez V, Schichter Isabella, Shariat Habib, Simon Sandra, Smith Hadley Stevens, Uveges Melissa, Green Robert C, Holm Ingrid A, Pereira Stacey
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: It is essential that studies of genomic sequencing (GS) in newborns and children include individuals from under-represented racial and ethnic groups (URG) to ensure future applications are equitably implemented. We conducted interviews with parents from URG to better understand their perspectives on GS research, develop strategies to reduce barriers to enrollment, and facilitate research participation.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 50 parents from URG.
RESULTS: Nearly all parents said they would be interested in participating in an infant GS study. Parents were interested in participating in GS research for reasons including clinical utility, personal utility, and/or family health benefits. Deterrents to enrollment cited by parents were discomfort with enrollment procedures (e.g., not wanting a heel stick), limited emotional bandwidth, unfavorable perceptions of the study, and concerns about potential results. Most parents said they would want to receive all types of genetic results, including actionable and non-actionable, as well as childhood- and adult-onset.
CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that parents from URG are interested in participating in GS research. Based upon these findings, we provide recommendations for designing GS studies that are responsive to their concerns.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 50 parents from URG.
RESULTS: Nearly all parents said they would be interested in participating in an infant GS study. Parents were interested in participating in GS research for reasons including clinical utility, personal utility, and/or family health benefits. Deterrents to enrollment cited by parents were discomfort with enrollment procedures (e.g., not wanting a heel stick), limited emotional bandwidth, unfavorable perceptions of the study, and concerns about potential results. Most parents said they would want to receive all types of genetic results, including actionable and non-actionable, as well as childhood- and adult-onset.
CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that parents from URG are interested in participating in GS research. Based upon these findings, we provide recommendations for designing GS studies that are responsive to their concerns.