MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00192-014-2339-4

Медицинская библиотека · International urogynecology journal · 2014

The natural history of cystocele recurrence.

Dietz H P, Hankins K J, Wong V

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Female pelvic organ prolapse is a common condition, and recurrence after surgery is considered a significant clinical issue, especially in the anterior compartment. To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no published data in the literature on the timing of recurrence. We used data obtained in clinical audit projects and a prospective surgical trial to define the natural history of cystocele recurrence.

METHODS

This is an observational retrospective study utilising data of 166 patients seen at least twice after anterior colporrhaphy, obtained from four clinical audit projects and one prospective surgical trial.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 481 postoperative visits at a mean follow-up of 1.11 years in 166 individuals. At last available follow-up, 80 (48%) had evidence of cystocele recurrence (ICS POP-Q stage 2+), and 44 (27%) reported symptoms of prolapse. Ultrasound evidence of cystocele recurrence was seen in 74 women (45%). Regression modelling demonstrated that the likelihood of recurrence was highest between 1 and 2 years' follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystocele recurrence after anterior colporrhaphy seems to be a relatively early phenomenon, with maximum prevalence reached at 18-24 months.

Для цитирования: Dietz H P, Hankins K J, Wong V. The natural history of cystocele recurrence.. International urogynecology journal. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2339-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.