DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2024.09.007
Cytogenetic spectrum and clinical presentation of Klinefelter syndrome: A comprehensive study from South India.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is a common sex chromosome abnormality that mostly presents as testicular failure and a myriad of other clinical features. The phenotypic features and their severity vary between individuals, age groups and cytogenetic subtypes. Karyotyping remains the method of choice for the diagnosis of KS despite advanced molecular testing in this modern era. The objective of this study was to determine the cytogenetic subtypes, clinical presentation and hormonal profile of patients with KS.
METHODS
Retrospective observational study comprised patients with KS determined by cytogenetic analysis at the tertiary care centre in south India from 2001 to 2019. Clinical details including testicular size, hormone levels and semen analysis were obtained from the medical records.
RESULTS
There were 147 KS (145 post-natal and 2 pre-natal) patients ranging in age from two days to 51 years, 116 (74.8%) patients being ≥18 years. Classic (cKS), mosaic (mKS) and variant KS (vKS) accounted for 126 (85.7%), 9 (6.1%) and 12 (8.2%) cases and their mean ages were 26.6, 29.6 and 12.8 years, respectively. cKS and mKS had diverse clinical presentations including several co-morbidities of which small testes were most common (94.8%). vKS presented with behavioural problems (58.3%) without any comorbidities. Testosterone (p < 0.05), FSH and LH levels were abnormal in >90% of patients.
CONCLUSION
All three cytogenetic subtypes of KS were seen in our patients. cKS was seen in all ages, mKS was common in adults and vKS was seen predominantly in children. Early diagnosis of KS and timely medical intervention may alter the clinical outcomes and improve the quality of life.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.