MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2174/2772432816666210825102726

Медицинская библиотека · Current reviews in clinical and experimental pharmacology · 2022

N-Acetyl Cysteine in Rodenticide Poisoning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rashid Muhammed, Chandran Viji Pulikkel, Nair Sreedharan, Muthu Deepa Sudalai, Pappuraj Jemima, Jacob Krupa Ann, Sridhar Balaji, Mark Karen, Hyder Shabnam, Khan Sohil, Thunga Girish

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Treatment with N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) in rodenticide poisoning has not been well established due to mixed study results and insufficient evidence. This review aimed to summarize the clinical benefits of NAC in the management of rodenticide poisoning.

METHODS

This review follows the PICOS framework and the PRISMA guidelines. Pub- Med/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane library were searched to identify the published literature from inception to September 2020, and a reference search was performed for additional relevant studies. The English language studies addressing the use of NAC in rodenticide poisoning were considered for the review. We considered all experimental and observational studies due to the insufficient number of interventional studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies (two RCTs, four observational, and four descriptive) out of 2,178 studies with 492 participants were considered for the review. Only six studies (two RCTs, one prospective, and three retrospective studies) reported recovery and mortality. Pooled results of RCTs (n=2) showed a significant recovery rate (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.97; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]:1.69-9.30), whereas summary estimates of prospective and retrospective studies recorded a non-significant effect. Metaanalysis of RCTs (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.11-0.59; n=2) and retrospective studies (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.15-0.78; n=3) showed a significant reduction in mortality, whereas pooled analysis of prospective studies recorded a non-significant effect. A significant reduction in intubation or ventilation (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.11-0.60; 2 RCTs) and a non-significant (P=0.41) difference in duration of hospitalization was observed with NAC when compared to the non-NAC treated group. The quality of the included studies appeared to be moderate to high.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that NAC showed better survival and lower mortality rate when compared to non-NAC treated group; hence NAC can be considered for the management of rodenticide poisoning.

Для цитирования: Rashid Muhammed, Chandran Viji Pulikkel, Nair Sreedharan, Muthu Deepa Sudalai, Pappuraj Jemima, Jacob Krupa Ann, Sridhar Balaji, Mark Karen, Hyder Shabnam, Khan Sohil, Thunga Girish. N-Acetyl Cysteine in Rodenticide Poisoning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Current reviews in clinical and experimental pharmacology. 2022. DOI: 10.2174/2772432816666210825102726.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.