MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1086/344649

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2002

Epidemiology of bloodstream infection in nursing home residents: evaluation in a large cohort from multiple homes.

Mylotte Joseph M, Tayara Ammar, Goodnough Susan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This study sought to reevaluate the epidemiology of bloodstream infection in nursing home residents. The records of 166 nursing home residents admitted to an urban, public, university-affiliated hospital with 169 episodes of bloodstream infection between January 1997 and April 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. The most common organisms isolated were Escherichia coli (27% of isolates), Staphylococcus aureus (18%; 29% were methicillin-resistant strains), and Proteus mirabilis (13%). There was minimal resistance to quinolones and third-generation cephalosporins among aerobic gram-negative bacilli. The most common sources were the urinary tract (51% of episodes) and the lungs (11%); a source was not identified in 22% of episodes. Hospital mortality was 18%. Independent predictors of hospital mortality were a pulmonary source of infection, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, and leukocytosis >20,000 cells/mm3. Compared with other studies published in the past 2 decades, mortality was lower. The most common resistant organism was methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Для цитирования: Mylotte Joseph M, Tayara Ammar, Goodnough Susan. Epidemiology of bloodstream infection in nursing home residents: evaluation in a large cohort from multiple homes.. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2002. DOI: 10.1086/344649.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.