MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4274/tjtcs.2026.2025-12-11

Медицинская библиотека · Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026

Comparison of robot-assisted surgical and transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect: A single-center retrospective study.

Can İsa, Kadiroğulları Ersin, Apaydın Zinar, Aksu Timuçin, Duman Zihni Mert, Timur Barış, Yazıcı Batuhan, Kaya Musa, Demir Ali Rıza, İyigün Taner

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Atrial septal defect (ASD) closure can be performed using either transcatheter or robot-assisted surgical approaches. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, procedural characteristics, and complications associated with these two techniques in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 635 patients who underwent ASD closure via either robot-assisted surgery (Group I, n=290) or transcatheter closure (Group II, n=345). Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data, including procedural times, complications, and follow-up outcomes, were evaluated. In addition, patients treated after 2019 were analyzed as a subgroup and categorized as Group Is (robot-assisted surgery, n=101) and Group IIs (transcatheter closure, n=105).

RESULTS

Patients in Group I had significantly longer procedural times and hospital stays than those in Group II (p<0.001). Postoperative tricuspid regurgitation was more frequent in the transcatheter group (p=0.003). Device migration occurred in 3.2% of transcatheter cases. Overall neurological events occurred in 0.7% of Group I patients and 2.6% of Group II patients (p=0.06). No significant difference in postoperative arrhythmia rates was observed between the groups. In the subgroup analysis of patients treated after 2019, the mean hospital stay was 2.36±0.5 days in Group Is and 2.21±0.6 days in Group IIs (p=0.07). Ventilation time was 3.6±1.4 hours versus 3.1±1.9 hours (p=0.05), and intensive care unit stay was 7.8±2.9 hours versus 7.2±3.0 hours (p=0.20), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both transcatheter and robot-assisted surgical ASD closure are safe and effective when patients are appropriately selected. Robot-assisted surgery offers the additional advantage of concomitant tricuspid valve annuloplasty and demonstrates improved outcomes with increasing surgical experience. Larger prospective multicenter studies are needed to further validate these findings.

Для цитирования: Can İsa, Kadiroğulları Ersin, Apaydın Zinar, Aksu Timuçin, Duman Zihni Mert, Timur Barış, Yazıcı Batuhan, Kaya Musa, Demir Ali Rıza, İyigün Taner. Comparison of robot-assisted surgical and transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect: A single-center retrospective study.. Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi. 2026. DOI: 10.4274/tjtcs.2026.2025-12-11.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.