MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.adaj.2026.01.018

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2026

A rare case of migrating dermal filler mimicking lymphadenopathy.

Virata Michael Christian, Chai Raymond, Zakowski Maureen, Chess Quintus

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Injection of dermal fillers has been used increasingly for facial rejuvenation by practitioners of esthetic medicine. The rise in these procedures has led to more dermal filler-related complications that can mimic common pathologic conditions, such as infection and tumor.

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 30-year-old man sought treatment for bilateral submandibular nodules. Results of magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral masses and sonography was suggestive of cysts or lymph nodes. Analysis of sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology revealed abundant acellular substance with a foreign body reaction.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Radiologists may not recognize the nature of the lesion without the patient's history of injectable filler, and patients may not volunteer this information. The diagnosis is also more difficult in cases of dermal filler migration away from the site of original injection. In particular, head or neck masses may manifest as possible tumor or infection, which is diagnosed as dermal filler foreign body on biopsy. The authors describe the characteristic sonographic and cytologic findings and review the literature. Increased awareness among clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists may lead to better diagnosis and patient outcomes.

Для цитирования: Virata Michael Christian, Chai Raymond, Zakowski Maureen, Chess Quintus. A rare case of migrating dermal filler mimicking lymphadenopathy.. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2026.01.018.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.