The Medical journal of Australia · 2013
Unexplained variation in hospital caesarean section rates.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Yuen Yi Cathy, Roberts Christine L, Patterson Jillian A, Simpson Judy M, Nicholl Michael C, Morris Jonathan M, Ford Jane B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To assess recent hospital caesarean section (CS) rates in New South Wales, adjusted for case mix; to quantify the amount of variation that can be explained by case mix differences; and to examine the potential impact on the overall CS rate of reducing variation in practice.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based record linkage study of births in 81 hospitals in New South Wales, 2009-2010, using the Robson classification to categorise births, and multilevel logistic regression to examine variation in hospital CS rates within Robson groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital CS rates.
RESULTS: The overall CS rate was 30.9%, ranging from 11.8% to 47.4% (interquartile range, 23.9%-33.1%) among hospitals. The three groups contributing most to the overall CS rate all comprised women with a single cephalic pregnancy who gave birth at term, including: those who had had a previous CS (36.4% of all CSs); nulliparous women with an elective delivery (prelabour CS or labour induction, 23.4%); and nulliparous women with spontaneous labour (11.1%). After adjustment for case mix, marked unexplained variation in hospital CS rates persisted for: nulliparous women at term; women who had had a previous CS; multifetal pregnancies; and preterm births. If variation in practice was reduced for these risk-based groups by achieving the "best practice" rate, this would lower the overall rate by an absolute reduction of 3.6%, from 30.9% to 27.3%.
CONCLUSION: Understanding hospital heterogeneity in performing CS and implementing evidence-based practices may result in improved maternity care. We have identified five risk-based groups as priority targets for reducing practice variation in CS rates.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based record linkage study of births in 81 hospitals in New South Wales, 2009-2010, using the Robson classification to categorise births, and multilevel logistic regression to examine variation in hospital CS rates within Robson groups.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital CS rates.
RESULTS: The overall CS rate was 30.9%, ranging from 11.8% to 47.4% (interquartile range, 23.9%-33.1%) among hospitals. The three groups contributing most to the overall CS rate all comprised women with a single cephalic pregnancy who gave birth at term, including: those who had had a previous CS (36.4% of all CSs); nulliparous women with an elective delivery (prelabour CS or labour induction, 23.4%); and nulliparous women with spontaneous labour (11.1%). After adjustment for case mix, marked unexplained variation in hospital CS rates persisted for: nulliparous women at term; women who had had a previous CS; multifetal pregnancies; and preterm births. If variation in practice was reduced for these risk-based groups by achieving the "best practice" rate, this would lower the overall rate by an absolute reduction of 3.6%, from 30.9% to 27.3%.
CONCLUSION: Understanding hospital heterogeneity in performing CS and implementing evidence-based practices may result in improved maternity care. We have identified five risk-based groups as priority targets for reducing practice variation in CS rates.