The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2024
Impella 5.5 Support for Delayed Surgical Ventricular Septal Defect Repair-A Paradigm Shift?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eghbalzadeh Kaveh, Großmann Clara, Krasivskyi Ihor, Djordjevic Ilija, Kuhn Elmar W, Origel Romero Christian, Bakhtiary Farhad, Mader Navid, Deppe Antje Christin, Wahlers Thorsten C W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal defects (VSDs) remain a rare but life-threatening complication of myocardial infarction. Although the incidence has decreased due to better treatment options, the mortality rate remains high. The timing of VSD repair remains critical to outcome. The use of mechanical circulatory support is rarely described in the literature, although it may help to delay repair to allow tissue stabilization. While Impella is currently considered contraindicated due to the potential worsening of the right-to-left shunt and possible systemic embolization of necrotic debris, there is no comprehensive evidence for this. Therefore, we aimed to analyze whether the use of Impella 5.5 as a first choice for patients undergoing VSD repair should be considered for discussion.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyses four consecutive patients who underwent delayed ventricular septal repair after prior implantation of Impella 5.5 (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts, United States).
RESULTS: A total of 75% of patients (n = 3) presented with acute right heart failure prior to implantation with a mean systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 64 ± 3.0 mmHg. Implantation was performed under local anesthesia in three cases. The mean time to surgery was 9.8 ± 3.1 days. All patients remained on the Impella 5.5 device postoperatively. Weaning from Impella 5.5 was successful in 75% (n = 3). The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 22.3 ± 7.5 days.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative implantation of the Impella 5.5 device is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing VSD repair. Outcomes may be improved by performing Impella implantation under local anesthesia and continuing Impella support after VSD repair. However, it is important to note that these patients represent a high-risk cohort and the mortality rate remains high.
METHODS: This retrospective study analyses four consecutive patients who underwent delayed ventricular septal repair after prior implantation of Impella 5.5 (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, Massachusetts, United States).
RESULTS: A total of 75% of patients (n = 3) presented with acute right heart failure prior to implantation with a mean systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 64 ± 3.0 mmHg. Implantation was performed under local anesthesia in three cases. The mean time to surgery was 9.8 ± 3.1 days. All patients remained on the Impella 5.5 device postoperatively. Weaning from Impella 5.5 was successful in 75% (n = 3). The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 22.3 ± 7.5 days.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative implantation of the Impella 5.5 device is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing VSD repair. Outcomes may be improved by performing Impella implantation under local anesthesia and continuing Impella support after VSD repair. However, it is important to note that these patients represent a high-risk cohort and the mortality rate remains high.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeMaleHeart-Assist DevicesFemaleTime-to-TreatmentProsthesis DesignHeart Septal Defects, VentricularCardiac Surgical ProceduresProsthesis ImplantationMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAdultRecovery of FunctionVentricular Function, RightVentricular Septal Rupture