Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde · 1999
[No consensus on the definition, diagnosis and treatment of habitual abortion in the Netherlands].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goddijn M, van der Veen F, Ankum W M, Bonsel G J, Leschot N J, Boer K
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To review the current policy in diagnosis and treatment of recurrent miscarriage in the Netherlands.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
METHOD: A printed questionnaire was sent in 1996 to all 125 departments of gynaecology in the Netherlands with questions about definition, investigation and therapy of recurrent miscarriage.
RESULTS: The response rate was 90% (n = 112). Twenty-nine per cent of the respondents defined recurrent miscarriage as having two or more abortions and 71% as three or more abortions. In 42% of the departments a diagnostic protocol for recurrent miscarriage was present. Diagnostic investigations most frequently performed were vaginal ultrasound (79%), parental chromosome analysis (78%), thyroid-stimulating hormone (72%), lupus anticoagulant (69%), blood glucose (65%), hysterosalpingography (56%) and anticardiolipin antibodies (IgG, IgM) (56%). Therapy most frequently applied was prescription of folic acid (53%).
CONCLUSION: The definition of recurrent miscarriage differed. Uncertainty about a rational diagnostic approach was evident from the large number of tests requested by 20-50% of the respondents. Some diagnostic tests like immunological investigation and search for infectious factors were not followed by a therapeutical intervention.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
METHOD: A printed questionnaire was sent in 1996 to all 125 departments of gynaecology in the Netherlands with questions about definition, investigation and therapy of recurrent miscarriage.
RESULTS: The response rate was 90% (n = 112). Twenty-nine per cent of the respondents defined recurrent miscarriage as having two or more abortions and 71% as three or more abortions. In 42% of the departments a diagnostic protocol for recurrent miscarriage was present. Diagnostic investigations most frequently performed were vaginal ultrasound (79%), parental chromosome analysis (78%), thyroid-stimulating hormone (72%), lupus anticoagulant (69%), blood glucose (65%), hysterosalpingography (56%) and anticardiolipin antibodies (IgG, IgM) (56%). Therapy most frequently applied was prescription of folic acid (53%).
CONCLUSION: The definition of recurrent miscarriage differed. Uncertainty about a rational diagnostic approach was evident from the large number of tests requested by 20-50% of the respondents. Some diagnostic tests like immunological investigation and search for infectious factors were not followed by a therapeutical intervention.