Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
Facility-wide assessment of occupational exposure to dust, noise, and formaldehyde.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rueda Emilio Molina, Carter Ellison, L'Orange Christian, Cosgrove Meghan R, Williams Elizabeth A, Anderson Ashley A, Andales Marie J, Tryner Jessica, Long Marilee, Wilson Ander, Volckens John
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Exposure to particulate matter, hazardous gases, and noise among workers causes millions of deaths, injuries, and disabilities annually. These exposures are not measured frequently, and most workers are never monitored because resources for monitoring are limited globally. Even in high-income countries, just two or three samples per workplace inspection are collected on average. Considerably larger sample sizes are required to estimate measures of central tendency and upper percentiles of common exposure distributions. Therefore, interventions and epidemiological studies often rely on poor estimates of those parameters.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that a small team can cost-effectively measure all workers' exposures to multiple hazards within a facility (~100 workers) in a single day while minimizing participant burden and loss of productivity.
METHODS: We deployed novel, compact personal monitors-called AirPens-to measure exposures to total particulates, formaldehyde, and A-weighted noise among workers at a furniture manufacturing facility during one full work shift. AirPens were preloaded with sampling media and preprogrammed to minimize field deployment time. On-board sensor data were used to identify sampling anomalies, confirm that AirPens were worn, and validate sampling results. Valid samples were then used to estimate exposure distribution parameters.
RESULTS: A team of five people deployed 83 AirPens at the facility. After quality assurance screening, 67 PM, 67 noise, and 22 formaldehyde samples remained valid (or 72, 67, and 31, respectively if samples below the limit of detection are counted as valid). PM and noise exposure distribution parameters (e.g., arithmetic and geometric mean, 95th percentile) were estimated with high certainty. Uncertainty (i.e., confidence intervals) grew several fold when smaller sample sizes were analyzed.
SIGNIFICANCE: Use of streamlined multi-hazard monitoring technology enables dramatically higher sample throughput for workplace exposure assessment. This approach reduces the uncertainty of workplace risk assessment and facilitates more in-depth analyses of personal exposure.
IMPACT STATEMENT: Comprehensive monitoring of personal exposure to air pollution is lacking due to technological and logistical limitations inherent to established monitoring methods. This lack of monitoring limits occupational health practice and epidemiologic research, which rely on sufficient sample sizes to support expert judgments or statistical inferences. This work demonstrates a new wearable sampler for particle, gas, and noise hazards, designed to overcome typical barriers to personal exposure assessment (e.g., cost, time, participant burden). Results show that this new sampling approach can produce measurements of similar quality, but on a much larger scale, compared to established technology.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that a small team can cost-effectively measure all workers' exposures to multiple hazards within a facility (~100 workers) in a single day while minimizing participant burden and loss of productivity.
METHODS: We deployed novel, compact personal monitors-called AirPens-to measure exposures to total particulates, formaldehyde, and A-weighted noise among workers at a furniture manufacturing facility during one full work shift. AirPens were preloaded with sampling media and preprogrammed to minimize field deployment time. On-board sensor data were used to identify sampling anomalies, confirm that AirPens were worn, and validate sampling results. Valid samples were then used to estimate exposure distribution parameters.
RESULTS: A team of five people deployed 83 AirPens at the facility. After quality assurance screening, 67 PM, 67 noise, and 22 formaldehyde samples remained valid (or 72, 67, and 31, respectively if samples below the limit of detection are counted as valid). PM and noise exposure distribution parameters (e.g., arithmetic and geometric mean, 95th percentile) were estimated with high certainty. Uncertainty (i.e., confidence intervals) grew several fold when smaller sample sizes were analyzed.
SIGNIFICANCE: Use of streamlined multi-hazard monitoring technology enables dramatically higher sample throughput for workplace exposure assessment. This approach reduces the uncertainty of workplace risk assessment and facilitates more in-depth analyses of personal exposure.
IMPACT STATEMENT: Comprehensive monitoring of personal exposure to air pollution is lacking due to technological and logistical limitations inherent to established monitoring methods. This lack of monitoring limits occupational health practice and epidemiologic research, which rely on sufficient sample sizes to support expert judgments or statistical inferences. This work demonstrates a new wearable sampler for particle, gas, and noise hazards, designed to overcome typical barriers to personal exposure assessment (e.g., cost, time, participant burden). Results show that this new sampling approach can produce measurements of similar quality, but on a much larger scale, compared to established technology.