Urology · 1994
Reconstruction of urinary and gastrointestinal tracts in total pelvic exenteration: experience at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goluboff E T, McKiernan J M, Todd G, Nowygrod R, Smith D, Olsson C A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of and complications from total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with maintenance of urethral and anal sphincter function for locally invasive tumors of the pelvis.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 4 patients who have undergone TPE with urethral and anal sphincter preservation at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in the last 2 years was performed with attention to perioperative morbidity and mortality, disease-free status, and need for further operative procedures.
RESULTS: Two patients had colorectal adenocarcinoma, 1 had squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, and 1 had prostate sarcoma. All had urinary tract reconstruction with orthotopic neobladder creation, and 3 of 4 had primary low rectal anastomoses for gastrointestinal reconstruction. One patient underwent creation of a J rectal pouch. One of 4 patients had received radiation therapy for the disease prior to surgery. There was no operative or perioperative mortality. Two of 4 patients required reoperation, 1 in the immediate postoperative period for repair of a left ureteral stricture, and the other 13 months postoperatively for repair of a rectal-neobladder fistula. With a mean follow-up of 25 months (range, 21 to 43 months), 3 of 4 patients are alive and free of disease. All living patients are continent of urine and 2 of 3 are continent of stool.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms that TPE can be effective in controlling a variety of locally advanced pelvic tumors and can be performed in conjunction with simultaneous genitourinary and gastrointestinal reconstruction with minimal morbidity.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 4 patients who have undergone TPE with urethral and anal sphincter preservation at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in the last 2 years was performed with attention to perioperative morbidity and mortality, disease-free status, and need for further operative procedures.
RESULTS: Two patients had colorectal adenocarcinoma, 1 had squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, and 1 had prostate sarcoma. All had urinary tract reconstruction with orthotopic neobladder creation, and 3 of 4 had primary low rectal anastomoses for gastrointestinal reconstruction. One patient underwent creation of a J rectal pouch. One of 4 patients had received radiation therapy for the disease prior to surgery. There was no operative or perioperative mortality. Two of 4 patients required reoperation, 1 in the immediate postoperative period for repair of a left ureteral stricture, and the other 13 months postoperatively for repair of a rectal-neobladder fistula. With a mean follow-up of 25 months (range, 21 to 43 months), 3 of 4 patients are alive and free of disease. All living patients are continent of urine and 2 of 3 are continent of stool.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms that TPE can be effective in controlling a variety of locally advanced pelvic tumors and can be performed in conjunction with simultaneous genitourinary and gastrointestinal reconstruction with minimal morbidity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalCarcinoma, Squamous CellColonColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHistiocytoma, Benign FibrousHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPelvic ExenterationPostoperative ComplicationsProstatic NeoplasmsRectumReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrinary BladderUterine Cervical Neoplasms