DOI 10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80201-7
Reconstruction of urinary and gastrointestinal tracts in total pelvic exenteration: experience at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To examine the effectiveness of and complications from total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with maintenance of urethral and anal sphincter function for locally invasive tumors of the pelvis.
METHODS
A retrospective review of 4 patients who have undergone TPE with urethral and anal sphincter preservation at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center in the last 2 years was performed with attention to perioperative morbidity and mortality, disease-free status, and need for further operative procedures.
RESULTS
Two patients had colorectal adenocarcinoma, 1 had squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, and 1 had prostate sarcoma. All had urinary tract reconstruction with orthotopic neobladder creation, and 3 of 4 had primary low rectal anastomoses for gastrointestinal reconstruction. One patient underwent creation of a J rectal pouch. One of 4 patients had received radiation therapy for the disease prior to surgery. There was no operative or perioperative mortality. Two of 4 patients required reoperation, 1 in the immediate postoperative period for repair of a left ureteral stricture, and the other 13 months postoperatively for repair of a rectal-neobladder fistula. With a mean follow-up of 25 months (range, 21 to 43 months), 3 of 4 patients are alive and free of disease. All living patients are continent of urine and 2 of 3 are continent of stool.
CONCLUSIONS
Our experience confirms that TPE can be effective in controlling a variety of locally advanced pelvic tumors and can be performed in conjunction with simultaneous genitourinary and gastrointestinal reconstruction with minimal morbidity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.