MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111586

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of surgery case reports · 2025

Meckel's diverticulum perforation by a fish bone mimicking acute appendicitis: A case report and review of the literature.

Adhikari Sharad Bahadur, Baral Paribartan, Ranabhat Namita, Bhusal Hari Prasad

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital abnormality of the gastrointestinal tract and is usually asymptomatic. The perforation of a MD by a foreign body is a very rare complication.

CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 53 years old male who presented with intermittent right lower abdominal pain and tenderness in the right iliac fossa on physical examination. With a provisional diagnosis of acute appendicitis, the patient was subjected to open appendectomy. Intraoperatively perforation of MD by an intact fish bone was identified and wedge resection performed.

DISCUSSION: Meckel's diverticulum is asymptomatic in most of the individuals with symptoms occurring in only 4-16 %. The clinical presentation ranges from intestinal obstruction, to bleeding, inflammation and perforation. Perforation of a MD due to a foreign body is extremely rare event and most cases are diagnosed during the operation. The treatment of symptomatic MD is surgical resection.

CONCLUSION

Perforation of MD should be kept in mind as a differential diagnosis in the evaluation and management of abdominal pain.

Для цитирования: Adhikari Sharad Bahadur, Baral Paribartan, Ranabhat Namita, Bhusal Hari Prasad. Meckel's diverticulum perforation by a fish bone mimicking acute appendicitis: A case report and review of the literature.. International journal of surgery case reports. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111586.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.