Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2012
Feasibility and clinical effects of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: an observational study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Riiskjaer Mads, Petersen Olav B, Uldbjerg Niels, Hvidman Lone, Helmig Rikke B, Forman Axel
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage performed as an interval procedure in non-pregnant women at high risk of second trimester spontaneous abortion and early preterm birth.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SAMPLE: Fifty-two consecutive patients at high risk of preterm birth.
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital.
METHODS: Patients were registered prospectively. Indications for surgery included classical cervical insufficiency, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) or two conizations/cervical amputation. Outcome of subsequent pregnancies was registered.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gestational age in subsequent pregnancies.
RESULTS: No operative or postoperative complications were observed. A total of 45 pregnancies were registered during the observation period. Among 36 pregnancies lasting beyond the 16th week of gestation, 30 women (83.3%) gave birth by cesarean section after 36 weeks of gestation and the overall mean gestational age was 37.4 weeks compared with a mean gestational age of 25.2 weeks of the pregnancies prior to the cerclage. The cesarean sections were uncomplicated in all but one patient, where a re-laparotomy was needed six hours later due to atonic postpartum hemorrhage without evident bleeding through the cervix.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is a feasible and safe procedure. Obstetrical outcomes are encouraging but prospective studies are needed to define the effectiveness of the laparoscopic cerclage compared with the traditional transvaginal approach.
DESIGN: Observational study.
SAMPLE: Fifty-two consecutive patients at high risk of preterm birth.
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital.
METHODS: Patients were registered prospectively. Indications for surgery included classical cervical insufficiency, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) or two conizations/cervical amputation. Outcome of subsequent pregnancies was registered.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gestational age in subsequent pregnancies.
RESULTS: No operative or postoperative complications were observed. A total of 45 pregnancies were registered during the observation period. Among 36 pregnancies lasting beyond the 16th week of gestation, 30 women (83.3%) gave birth by cesarean section after 36 weeks of gestation and the overall mean gestational age was 37.4 weeks compared with a mean gestational age of 25.2 weeks of the pregnancies prior to the cerclage. The cesarean sections were uncomplicated in all but one patient, where a re-laparotomy was needed six hours later due to atonic postpartum hemorrhage without evident bleeding through the cervix.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage is a feasible and safe procedure. Obstetrical outcomes are encouraging but prospective studies are needed to define the effectiveness of the laparoscopic cerclage compared with the traditional transvaginal approach.