Archivos espanoles de urologia · 2019
Long-term functional outcome and complications of male suburethral slings in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence: A prospective five-year follow-up study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Collado-Serra Argimiro, Domínguez-Escrig José, Ramírez-Backhaus Miguel, Gómez-Ferrer Álvaro, Casanova Juan, Rubio-Briones José
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Suburethral male slings are an alternative option for mild stress urinary incontinence. Our purpose is to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes, efficacy and worsening continence of male suburethral slings.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The functional outcomes of realignment/anatomical slings were evaluated with AdVance ®, and the outcomes of compressive slings were evaluated with InVance®. We considered 55 patients fulfilling 5 years of complete follow-up. We included patients with a 24-hour pad weight test <400 grams. Night-continent patients who also had positive "repositioning tests" were considered for AdVance®, whereas patients without sphincter contraction or previous pelvic radiotherapy were considered for InVance®.
RESULTS: Between February 2006 and September 2010, 24 AdVance® and 31 InVance® slings were implanted. The median follow-up times from sling insertion were 75 months in the AdVance® group (range: 64-97) and 86 months in the InVance® group (range: 61-108). At three months of follow-up, 43 of 55 patients were considered to be cured (pad-free) (78.1%), 79.1% in the AdVance® group and 77.4% in the InVance® group. Postoperatively, 16.6% of patients with AdVance® and 22.5% of patients with InVance® presented "de novo" urgency. At 5 years of follow-up, we observed 10 cases of some deterioration of continence, 3 patients in the AdVance® group and 7 in the InVance® group (15.8% and 29.1% of the initially cured, respectively). To date, there have been no reports of urethral sling erosion.
CONCLUSIONS: Male slings are safe and effective. Although we observed an increase in "de novo" urgency, in our experience, slings seemed to maintain their efficacy during long-term follow-up, and the risks of urethral erosion are low.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The functional outcomes of realignment/anatomical slings were evaluated with AdVance ®, and the outcomes of compressive slings were evaluated with InVance®. We considered 55 patients fulfilling 5 years of complete follow-up. We included patients with a 24-hour pad weight test <400 grams. Night-continent patients who also had positive "repositioning tests" were considered for AdVance®, whereas patients without sphincter contraction or previous pelvic radiotherapy were considered for InVance®.
RESULTS: Between February 2006 and September 2010, 24 AdVance® and 31 InVance® slings were implanted. The median follow-up times from sling insertion were 75 months in the AdVance® group (range: 64-97) and 86 months in the InVance® group (range: 61-108). At three months of follow-up, 43 of 55 patients were considered to be cured (pad-free) (78.1%), 79.1% in the AdVance® group and 77.4% in the InVance® group. Postoperatively, 16.6% of patients with AdVance® and 22.5% of patients with InVance® presented "de novo" urgency. At 5 years of follow-up, we observed 10 cases of some deterioration of continence, 3 patients in the AdVance® group and 7 in the InVance® group (15.8% and 29.1% of the initially cured, respectively). To date, there have been no reports of urethral sling erosion.
CONCLUSIONS: Male slings are safe and effective. Although we observed an increase in "de novo" urgency, in our experience, slings seemed to maintain their efficacy during long-term follow-up, and the risks of urethral erosion are low.