MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s41205-025-00265-y

Медицинская библиотека · 3D printing in medicine · 2025

Enhancing management of double outlet right ventricle when the interventricular communication is remote from the arterial roots through three-dimensional printing.

Kindi Hamood Nasar Al, Maddali Madan Mohan, Kandachar Pranav Subbaraya, Anderson Robert Henry

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Double outlet right ventricle with remote interventricular communication presents significant surgical challenges. Traditional imaging often fails to provide the detailed, three-dimensional anatomical insights required for complex cases. Advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing offer a valuable tool for preoperative planning and decision-making.

CASES: In the first case, a 5-year-old with double outlet right ventricle and remote interventricular communication underwent a Glenn procedure with anticipated univentricular repair. 3D printing revealed the potential for enlarging the communication, leading to a one-and-a-half ventricle repair. The second case involved a 2-day-old infant with double outlet right ventricle, aortic arch interruption, and remote communication. At one year, 3D modelling enabled a successful left ventricle-to-aorta baffle.

CONCLUSION

These cases underscore 3D printing's role in improving precision, reducing complications, and potentially lowering costs in managing complex congenital heart disease.

Для цитирования: Kindi Hamood Nasar Al, Maddali Madan Mohan, Kandachar Pranav Subbaraya, Anderson Robert Henry. Enhancing management of double outlet right ventricle when the interventricular communication is remote from the arterial roots through three-dimensional printing.. 3D printing in medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s41205-025-00265-y.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.