DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.055
The surgical management of extra-cranial trigeminal nerve palsies: A retrospective case series.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To assess for functional improvement in outcomes following supermicrosurgical restoration across a cohort of patients with a spectrum of trigeminal nerve disorders.
PATIENTS &
METHODS
In a retrospective case series over three years (2016-18), twenty patients were included in a cohort of trigeminal nerve palsy patients. Eleven patients with corneal anaesthesia underwent corneal neurotisation procedures and were followed up using Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometry. Six patients with sensory trigeminal nerve injuries had direct nerve coaptation and neuroma excision. Three patients with trigeminal motor nerve palsies were followed up with photography for contour improvement.
RESULTS
Regarding corneal neurotisation, there was evidence of significant improvement in protective corneal sensation and also blinking frequency. Regarding facial sensory disturbances, all patients had full resolution of painful trigeminal neuroma symptoms. In two cases of iatrogenic trigeminal motor palsies with contour defects, adipo-fascial variants of the superficial circumflex iliac artery (SCIP) free flap achieved excellent restoration of facial contour in lieu of facial lipofilling. In another case of a necrotising infection of the head and neck with loss of all masticatory muscles, a free functional muscle using a chimaeric vastus lateralis-ALT flap was used to restore masticatory and facial movement in a single stage procedure.
CONCLUSION
Using combinations and permutations of current surgical techniques, it is possible to successfully restore both form and function for patients with sensory as well as motor trigeminal nerve palsies. This sets a precedent for the expansion of cranial nerve surgery as an evolving sub-speciality.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.