Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2024
The effect of anti-pronation and anti-supination taping on neuromuscular control in recreational athletes with Achilles Tendinopathy: A randomized controlled cross-over trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Tongzhou, Zhao Yilin, Adams Roger, Malliaras Peter, Witchalls Jeremy, Fu Weijie, Han Jia
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of different directions of athletic taping on neuromuscular control of the lower limb in recreational athletes with Achilles tendinopathy (AT).
DESIGN: Crossover Study.
SETTING: Functional assessment laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty recreational athletes with AT.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were randomly treated with anti-pronation taping, anti-supination taping, or no-taping. Under different taping conditions, neuromuscular tests were performed in random order: ankle proprioception Active Movement Extent Discrimination Assessment (AMEDA), Weight-Bearing Lunge Test (WBLT), single leg hop test, figure-of-eight hop test and Lower Extremity Functional Test (LEFT).
RESULTS: Compared with no-taping, both anti-pronation taping and anti-supination taping significantly improved AMEDA proprioception test scores (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.466), figure-of-eight hop performance (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.307), unilateral LEFT scores (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.448), and may reduce risk of lower limb injury in recreational athletes with AT (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.432). Taping significantly reduced WBLT values (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.259) but had no significant effect on single leg hop test scores (p = 0.139). Importantly, no difference between the two taping conditions was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Both directions of athletic taping were equally effective in improving ankle proprioception, lower extremity functional performance, and reducing the risk of injury in athletes with AT, but had no significant effect on lower limb explosive strength and were associated with significantly reduced ankle dorsiflexion.
DESIGN: Crossover Study.
SETTING: Functional assessment laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty recreational athletes with AT.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants were randomly treated with anti-pronation taping, anti-supination taping, or no-taping. Under different taping conditions, neuromuscular tests were performed in random order: ankle proprioception Active Movement Extent Discrimination Assessment (AMEDA), Weight-Bearing Lunge Test (WBLT), single leg hop test, figure-of-eight hop test and Lower Extremity Functional Test (LEFT).
RESULTS: Compared with no-taping, both anti-pronation taping and anti-supination taping significantly improved AMEDA proprioception test scores (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.466), figure-of-eight hop performance (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.307), unilateral LEFT scores (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.448), and may reduce risk of lower limb injury in recreational athletes with AT (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.432). Taping significantly reduced WBLT values (p < 0.001,ηp2 = 0.259) but had no significant effect on single leg hop test scores (p = 0.139). Importantly, no difference between the two taping conditions was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Both directions of athletic taping were equally effective in improving ankle proprioception, lower extremity functional performance, and reducing the risk of injury in athletes with AT, but had no significant effect on lower limb explosive strength and were associated with significantly reduced ankle dorsiflexion.