Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use and cardio-renal outcomes in non-proteinuric chronic kidney disease: a post-hoc analysis of the Frontier of Renal Outcome Modification-Japan study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sugawara Hirohito, Yoshida Kiryu, Saito Chie, Saito Yoshinori, Kato Masanori, Kato Akihiko, Narita Ichiei, Maruyama Shoichi, Wada Jun, Wada Takashi, Yamamoto Masahiro, Ito Hidetoshi, Yamagata Kunihiro, Ogata Hiroaki
Аннотация
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) frequently experience cardiovascular events, and as per current therapeutic guidelines, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) can protect the cardiovascular system in those with proteinuric CKD. Effectiveness of RASi in treating non-proteinuric CKD is still unknown, yet. In order to evaluate the impact of RASi on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with non-proteinuric CKD, we performed a post-hoc analysis of the Frontier of Renal Outcome Modification-Japan study. A urine protein-to-creatinine ratio less than 0.15 g/g or negative/trace protein on urinalysis was considered as non-proteinuric CKD. Those who have undergone dialysis, kidney transplant recipients, and patients who refused to give their consent were excluded. A composite of cardiovascular events, initiation of renal replacement therapy, and all-cause mortality was studied as the primary outcome. Of 2379 patients with CKD, 630 met the criteria for non-proteinuric CKD. Among them, 490 used RASi, and 140 did not. Although the RASi group was considerably younger and had a higher prevalence of hypertension and calcium channel blocker use, baseline characteristics were comparable. 12.1% of the control group and 16.7% of the RASi group experienced the primary outcome during follow-up, with no significant difference (adjusted HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.81-2.31). Secondary outcomes and analyses of RASi use for the whole observation period did not show any significant differences (adjusted HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.43-1.56). These results imply that RASi was not linked to a decreased risk of mortality or long-term events in those with nonproteinuric CKD.