Information, discrimination and divergence in cytology. III. Optimization of classification of Papanicolaou smears.

The performance of a cytology laboratory can be objectively quantitated as the total discrimination, a defined quantity of information. The total discrimination is dependent on the number of categories used in gynecologic cytology and on the corresponding histologic states; over-classification results in a higher rate of misinformation and reduced total discrimination. Total divergence is another measure of the association between cytologic categories and histologic states; in contrast to the total discrimination, the total divergence does not require a one-to-one correspondence between the cytologic categories and the histologic states. Using data from the Gynecologic Cytology Laboratory of the University of Minnesota, the total discrimination was maximized when gynecologic cytology used three categories of diagnosis, consisting of (1) normal, atypical benign or reactive atypia, (2) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and (3) all malignancies. The use of four categories, (1) normal, atypical benign or reactive atypia, (2) mild or moderate dysplasia, (3) severe dysplasia or squamous carcinoma in situ and (4) all malignancies, was almost equally informative. Observations on the total divergences resulted in similar conclusions. These findings generally support the recommendation of the consensus workshop sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (the Bethesda System nomenclature) to group all degrees of CIN into two large categories.