MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society · 2011

[A case of thoracic actinomycosis in the left lung coexisting with pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma in the right lung].

Okuda Ryo, Izumo Takehiro, Yoshikawa Mitsuhiro, Kakuta Yumi, Tamaoki Jun, Nagai Atsushi

Клинический случайАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

An 80-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with chest pain. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed masses in both lung fields. The findings from a biopsy specimen of the left chest wall showed radially filamentous microorganisms, therefore a diagnosis of thoracic actinomycosis was made. The specimen from the mass in the right upper lobe obtained by transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) did not yield a definitive, and we started administration of penicillin. After 10 weeks the mass and consolidation in left upper lobe improved, but the size of the mass in the right upper lobe had increased. FDG-PET showed high accumulation only in the right lung mass, and TBLB was performed again, with pathological findings of squamous cell carcinoma. In most cases it is very difficult to differentiate pulmonary actinomycosis from lung cancer. Pulmonary actinomycosis with coexisting lung cancer is very rare. If penicillin is ineffective in a patient with actinomycosis, pulmonary actinomycosis with coexisting with lung cancer should be considered.

Для цитирования: Okuda Ryo, Izumo Takehiro, Yoshikawa Mitsuhiro, Kakuta Yumi, Tamaoki Jun, Nagai Atsushi. [A case of thoracic actinomycosis in the left lung coexisting with pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma in the right lung].. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai zasshi = the journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society. 2011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.