MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.64898/2026.05.20.26353693

Медицинская библиотека · medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026

GWAS Meta-analysis Identifies Novel Associated Loci and Points to Causal Tissues in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.

Chen Liyin, Kim Soo Hyun, Truong Buu, Rämö Joel T, Gorman Bryan R, van Dijk Elon H C, Brinks Joost, Nikopensius Tiit, Choi Seung Hoan, Kajanne Risto, Mehtonen Juha, Kaarniranta Kai, Sobrin Lucia, Kurki Mitja, Yzer Suzanne, VA Million Veteran Program, FinnGen, Wu Wen-Chih, Turunen Joni A, Segrè Ayellet J, Mercader Josep Maria, Huerta Alicia, Daly Mark J, Palotie Aarno, Ellinor Patrick T, Boon Camiel Jf, Iyengar Sudha K, Peachey Neal S, Natarajan Pradeep, Rossin Elizabeth J

СтатьяПрепринтПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To define CSC genetic architecture and identify implicated ocular tissues, cell types, genes, and circulating proteins.

DATA SOURCES: Genome-wide data were assembled from FinnGen, All of Us, Mass General Brigham Biobank, Million Veteran Program, and a Dutch chronic CSC cohort. Serum protein quantitative trait loci, human single-cell ocular atlases, and UK Biobank macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging were used for downstream analyses.

STUDY SELECTION: Five European-ancestry cohorts with genome-wide data and cohort-specific CSC case-control definitions were included, comprising 2,584 cases and 1,044,455 controls. Variants present in at least 2 cohorts were meta-analyzed.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Cohort-level GWASs were adjusted for age, age squared, sex, genotyping array or batch, and 10 genetic principal components, then combined using fixed-effects inverse-variance meta-analysis. Post-GWAS analyses included gene prioritization, colocalization, Mendelian randomization, single-cell disease-relevance scoring, and testing of a CSC genetic risk score in UK Biobank OCT images.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Genome-wide significant CSC loci, effector genes and proteins, tissue and cell-type enrichment, and CSC-relevant OCT abnormalities.

RESULTS

Across 11,068,938 variants, 10 loci reached genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10-8), including 3 novel loci near TGFB1, LINC00551, and LOC105375630 and 7 replicated loci near CFH, CD46, NOTCH4, PREX1, PTPRB, GATA5, and TNFRSF10A. Integrative analyses prioritized 10 candidate effector genes. Colocalization and Mendelian randomization implicated circulating TNFRSF10A, TGFB1, and CASP10 levels. Single-cell analyses localized genetic risk to sclera (P = 2.0 × 10-4) and vascular endothelial cells (P = 4.0 × 10-4), with fibroblast enrichment. In UK Biobank, OCT abnormalities were more frequent in the top vs bottom 1% of CSC genetic risk (18 of 109 [16.5%] vs 8 of 134 [6.0%]; odds ratio, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.65-10.87; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this GWAS meta-analysis, CSC susceptibility localized predominantly to scleral and vascular biology rather than primary retinal pigment epithelial dysfunction. These findings support CSC as a sclerovascular disorder and nominate complement regulation, endothelial signaling, and extracellular matrix pathways for future study.

Для цитирования: Chen Liyin, Kim Soo Hyun, Truong Buu, Rämö Joel T, Gorman Bryan R, van Dijk Elon H C, Brinks Joost, Nikopensius Tiit, Choi Seung Hoan, Kajanne Risto, Mehtonen Juha, Kaarniranta Kai, Sobrin Lucia, Kurki Mitja, Yzer Suzanne, VA Million Veteran Program, FinnGen, Wu Wen-Chih, Turunen Joni A, Segrè Ayellet J, Mercader Josep Maria, Huerta Alicia, Daly Mark J, Palotie Aarno, Ellinor Patrick T, Boon Camiel Jf, Iyengar Sudha K, Peachey Neal S, Natarajan Pradeep, Rossin Elizabeth J. GWAS Meta-analysis Identifies Novel Associated Loci and Points to Causal Tissues in Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences. 2026. DOI: 10.64898/2026.05.20.26353693.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.