MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.033

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2014

Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to cardiac retransplantation: a single center experience.

Clerkin Kevin J, Thomas Sunu S, Haythe Jennifer, Schulze P Christian, Farr Maryjane, Takayama Hiroo, Jorde Ulrich P, Restaino Susan W, Naka Yoshifumi, Mancini Donna M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cardiac retransplantation is increasing in frequency. Recent data have shown that retransplantation outcomes are now comparable with primary transplantation. The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to retransplantation has similar post-retransplant outcomes to those without MCS, but the success of bridging patients to retransplant with MCS has not been well studied.

METHODS

From January 2000 to February 2014 at Columbia University Medical Center, 84 patients were listed for retransplantation. Of this cohort, 48 patients underwent retransplantation, 15 were bridged with MCS, 24 died, and 6 clinically improved. A retrospective analysis was performed examining waiting list time, survival to retransplantation, and survival after retransplant. The effect of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) allocation policy change in 2006 on waiting list time and MCS use was also investigated.

RESULTS

Of 48 patients who underwent retransplantation, 11 were bridged with MCS. Overall 1-year survival to retransplantation was 81.3%. There was no significant difference in waiting list survival (p = 0.71) in those with and without MCS. Death from cardiac arrest or multiorgan failure with infection was more frequent in the medically managed group (p = 0.002). After the UNOS 2006 allocation policy change, waiting list time (599 ± 936 days in Era 1 vs 526 ± 498 days in Era 2, p = 0.65) and waiting list survival (p = 0.22) between eras were comparable, but there was a trend toward greater use of MCS (p = 0.13). Survival after retransplant was acceptable.

CONCLUSION

The use of MCS as a bridge to cardiac retransplantation is a reasonable strategy.

Для цитирования: Clerkin Kevin J, Thomas Sunu S, Haythe Jennifer, Schulze P Christian, Farr Maryjane, Takayama Hiroo, Jorde Ulrich P, Restaino Susan W, Naka Yoshifumi, Mancini Donna M. Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to cardiac retransplantation: a single center experience.. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.09.033.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.