DOI 10.1007/s00415-022-11382-7
Sjögren syndrome and RFC1-CANVAS sensory ganglionopathy: co-occurrence or misdiagnosis?
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: RFC1-CANVAS and primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) are among the most frequent causes of sensory ganglionopathy (SG) and can present simultaneously in a given patient, sharing confounding signs and symptoms. We describe the clinical characteristics of patients with SG due to CANVAS who were suspected of having or had received a previous diagnosis of pSS.
METHODS
Patients with SG and a genetically confirmed RFC1-CANVAS followed in our centre were ascertained and their personal history of pSS was collected.
RESULTS
Among the 71 patients with CANVAS, six patients (all females) had been diagnosed with pSS by their clinicians. In these six patients, the mean age at onset of the SG was 61 years, four patients describing gait instability and positive sensory symptoms, one only gait instability and one only positive sensory symptoms. Five patients had a history of chronic cough; signs at examination included a cerebellar syndrome (n = 3), vestibulopathy (n = 2), pes cavus (n = 3) and dysautonomia (n = 2). On neurophysiological examination, SG was generally severe and symmetrical. All patients presented a sicca syndrome, but only four patients had a confirmed pSS as per 2016 ACR-EULAR classification criteria. Four patients were treated but did not respond to immunosuppressive therapy, one suffering from side effects.
INTERPRETATION: The suspicion or diagnosis of pSS in a patient with SG should not exclude RFC1 expansion analysis, as a CANVAS diagnosis may dissuade the clinician from initiating or continuing immunosuppressive therapy, especially in unconfirmed pSS patients. Importantly, a sicca syndrome may lead to pSS misdiagnosis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.