MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11912-026-01833-z

Медицинская библиотека · Current oncology reports · 2026

What are the Unmet Needs in Managing Digestive Neuroendocrine Carcinomas?

Sorbye Halfdan, McNamara Mairéad G, Tesselaar Margot Et, Cives Mauro, Knappskog Stian, Perren Aurel, Strosberg Jonathan

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights the major unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment of digestive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and describes the current and evolving evidence on these aspects.

RECENT FINDINGS: Improved pathological criteria are needed to accurately diagnose NEC and distinguish this entity from high-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours as well as from adenocarcinoma. Studies on the molecular mechanisms underlying the extreme aggressiveness of the disease are ongoing. Data are lacking on optimal selection of patients with locoregional disease for primary tumour surgery and use of adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment. For patients with metastatic disease, there has been no improvement in systemic treatment over the last two decades and immunotherapy has limited benefit. Novel antigen-directed strategies targeting DLL3 are evolving. Digestive NEC are among the most aggressive cancers and prognosis remains poor. There have been only minor improvements over the last two decades. To improve diagnosis and therapy, the unmet needs discussed in this review must be addressed.

Для цитирования: Sorbye Halfdan, McNamara Mairéad G, Tesselaar Margot Et, Cives Mauro, Knappskog Stian, Perren Aurel, Strosberg Jonathan. What are the Unmet Needs in Managing Digestive Neuroendocrine Carcinomas?. Current oncology reports. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-026-01833-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.