MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3399/bjgp10x515412

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010

Positive predictive values of ≥5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review.

Shapley Mark, Mansell Gemma, Jordan Joanne L, Jordan Kelvin P

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The positive predictive value (PPV) for cancer of symptoms, signs, and non-diagnostic test results of patients routinely consulting a GP (unselected primary care populations) can help to determine when malignancy should be excluded. Comparisons with other illness indicate that a value of 5% or more may be regarded as highly predictive.

AIM: To identify symptoms, signs, and non-diagnostic test results in unselected primary care populations that are highly predictive of cancer.

DESIGN OF STUDY: Systematic review.

SETTING

Primary care.

METHOD: Fourteen bibliographic databases were searched, using terms for primary care, cancer, and predictive values. Reference lists of relevant papers were hand-searched. Data were extracted and the quality of each paper was assessed using predefined criteria, and checked by a second reviewer.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were identified. PPVs of 5% or more in specific age and sex groups were reported for: rectal bleeding, change in bowel habit, and iron deficiency anaemia and colorectal cancer; haematuria and urological cancer; malignant rectal examination and prostate cancer; haemoptysis and lung cancer; dysphagia and oesophageal cancer; breast lump and breast cancer; and postmenopausal bleeding and gynaecological cancer.

CONCLUSION

Robust evidence was found for eight symptoms, signs, and non-diagnostic test results as strongly indicative of cancer for specific age and sex groups in unselected primary care populations. These have the potential to improve the early diagnosis of some cancers in primary care by the use of computer warning flags, improved guidelines, audit, and appraisal.

Для цитирования: Shapley Mark, Mansell Gemma, Jordan Joanne L, Jordan Kelvin P. Positive predictive values of ≥5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review.. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2010. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10x515412.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.