MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.58580

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2024

Post-cholecystectomy Clip Migration: A Case Report.

Singh Renisha, Arumugam Praveen, Mathur Kushagra, Deo Abhishek

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Surgical clip migration into the common bile duct (CBD) with subsequent stone formation is an exceedingly rare complication following both laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy, with fewer than 100 cases reported in the literature. Herein, we present the case of a 78-year-old female who presented with abdominal pain and dark urine six years after an open cholecystectomy. Her abdominal ultrasonography revealed no abnormalities, with only mild derangements noted in liver function tests. However, computed tomography of the abdomen unveiled a single metallic surgical clip lodged within the CBD, surrounded by a bile stone, alongside another clip at the gallbladder fossa. The patient underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), during which the clip was successfully removed. The procedure has utilized SpyGlass cholangioscopy. While clip migration into the CBD remains a rare phenomenon, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with obstructive jaundice or biliary colic post-cholecystectomy. Minimally invasive management by ERCP is the procedure of choice for migrated clips-related complications but surgical common bile duct exploration may be necessary. This case highlights the importance of vigilance and prompt intervention in managing post-cholecystectomy clip migration (PCCM) but potentially serious postoperative complications.

Для цитирования: Singh Renisha, Arumugam Praveen, Mathur Kushagra, Deo Abhishek. Post-cholecystectomy Clip Migration: A Case Report.. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58580.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.