MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/10903127.2026.2658592

Медицинская библиотека · Prehospital emergency care · 2026

Intranasal Versus Intramuscular Midazolam in Pediatric Seizure Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohnkern Jonathan D, Khalid Ayesha, Ibrahim Marwa, Dave Vedanti, Chierighini Pietra Peterlini, Riaño Alexandra Salazar, Ajibade Tolulope, Martins Shehan Thaís S

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Rapid termination of pediatric seizures is a critical determinant of neurological outcomes. Benzodiazepines are the established first-line therapy, yet intravenous (IV) access is frequently unavailable at initial presentation, necessitating reliance on non-IV routes. However, the optimal non-IV route remains controversial. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing intranasal (IN) and intramuscular (IM) midazolam administration to determine which route is associated with more rapid and reliable seizure control in pediatric patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies comparing IN and IM midazolam in pediatric patients with seizures. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity quantified using the I2 statistic. Subgroup analyses were performed by administration setting and benzodiazepine dose. The prospective protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251237948).

RESULTS

Five studies comprising 3,933 pediatric patients requiring pharmacological intervention for seizures were included, of whom 97.9% were managed in the prehospital setting. IM midazolam was associated with a lower likelihood of requiring rescue therapy overall (RR 1.29; 95% CI 1.15-1.45; p = 0.004; I2 = 5%) and in the out-of-hospital setting (RR 1.30; 95% CI 1.11-1.51; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%). The association persisted when the analysis was restricted to studies using the recommended 0.2 mg/kg dose (RR 1.26; 95% CI 1.10-1.43; p = 0.01; I2 = 6%). IM midazolam was also associated with a shorter time to seizure termination (MD 23.60 s; 95% CI 2.31-44.89; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Among pediatric patients with acute seizures managed in settings where IV access is not established, particularly the prehospital environment, IM midazolam was associated with more rapid seizure termination and lower rescue therapy use than IN midazolam and represents a reasonable first-line option in these settings.

Для цитирования: Mohnkern Jonathan D, Khalid Ayesha, Ibrahim Marwa, Dave Vedanti, Chierighini Pietra Peterlini, Riaño Alexandra Salazar, Ajibade Tolulope, Martins Shehan Thaís S. Intranasal Versus Intramuscular Midazolam in Pediatric Seizure Control: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Prehospital emergency care. 2026. DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2026.2658592.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.