MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09553002.2025.2494554

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of radiation biology · 2025

LBDNet inter-laboratory comparison at high doses of ionizing radiation using the dicentric plus caffeine assay.

Romero Ivonne, Mandina Cardoso Tania, Cabitto Mariana, Deminge Mayra, Rearte Julieta Fernandez, Vaquero Hernan, Farias de Lima Fabiana, Esposito Mendes Mariana, Melo Silva Laís, Lafuente-Álvarez Erika Flavia, Rada-Tarifa Ana, Verdejo Valentina, Radl Analia, Saavedra Nicolás, Santibañez Mauricio, Brenes Obando Nelson, Chaves-Campos Fabio Andrés, Ortíz Fernando, Valle Luisa, González Mesa Jorge Ernesto, Bastidas Angela, Muñoz-Velástegui Gabriela, Arceo-Maldonado Carolina, Guerrero-Carbajal Yolanda Citlali, Aguilar-Coronel Sara, Monjagata Norma, Espinoza-Zevallos Marco, Martínez-López Wilner, Mechoso Burix, Di Tomaso María Vittoria, Falcón de Vargas Aida, García Lima Omar

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of the LBDNet laboratories in estimating dose over 5 Gy of ionizing radiation using the dicentric chromosome plus caffeine assay.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Dose-response curve fitting: Peripheral blood was irradiated in vitro between 5 and 25 Gy. Then, the DC plus caffeine assay was carried out. Thirteen laboratories received and analyzed metaphase images. The linear dose-response curve was fitted for each laboratory. Dose estimation was performed analyzing coded metaphase images from three different irradiated samples (7.5, 15, 20 Gy) and using the fitted curve from every laboratory.

RESULTS

The dose estimation accuracy was within the expected dose ranges. The 76.9%, 84.6% and 69.2% of the estimated doses fell into the ± 20% of the true radiation dose. The 92.3%, 92.3%, and 61.5% of the 95% of the confidence interval of the estimated doses included the true radiation dose. The trueness was 0.9%, 4.4% and 9.6%. The Coefficients of Variation of the estimated doses were 14.5%, 16.1% and 17.8%. Results from only one laboratory were deemed questionable for dose estimation, based on the Z-score derived from robust methods.

CONCLUSION

The intercomparison study yielded satisfactory results; however, dose estimation accuracy tended to decrease, and variability between laboratory results increased as the dose level rose.

Для цитирования: Romero Ivonne, Mandina Cardoso Tania, Cabitto Mariana, Deminge Mayra, Rearte Julieta Fernandez, Vaquero Hernan, Farias de Lima Fabiana, Esposito Mendes Mariana, Melo Silva Laís, Lafuente-Álvarez Erika Flavia, Rada-Tarifa Ana, Verdejo Valentina, Radl Analia, Saavedra Nicolás, Santibañez Mauricio, Brenes Obando Nelson, Chaves-Campos Fabio Andrés, Ortíz Fernando, Valle Luisa, González Mesa Jorge Ernesto, Bastidas Angela, Muñoz-Velástegui Gabriela, Arceo-Maldonado Carolina, Guerrero-Carbajal Yolanda Citlali, Aguilar-Coronel Sara, Monjagata Norma, Espinoza-Zevallos Marco, Martínez-López Wilner, Mechoso Burix, Di Tomaso María Vittoria, Falcón de Vargas Aida, García Lima Omar. LBDNet inter-laboratory comparison at high doses of ionizing radiation using the dicentric plus caffeine assay.. International journal of radiation biology. 2025. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2025.2494554.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.