MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ajp.0b013e318247309a

Медицинская библиотека · The Clinical journal of pain · 2013

Treatment of chronic, intractable pain with a conventional implantable pulse generator: a meta-analysis of 4 clinical studies.

Slavin Konstantin V, Vaisman Julien, Pollack Kenneth L, Simopoulos Thomas T, Kowlowitz Edward, Weinand Martin E, Norregaard Thorkild V, Genesis Study Investigators

СтатьяМетаанализМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To provide further short-term (6 mo) and long-term (1 y) evidence for the use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with a conventional implantable pulse generator in the management of chronic, intractable pain.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of 4 prospective, multicenter studies that collected outcome data from patients implanted with SCS to treat chronic pain of the trunk and/or limbs (Genesis IPG system). Two of these were conducted as long-term studies lasting 1 year, and 2 as shorter term studies lasting 6 months. A total of 300 patients from 28 investigational sites were prospectively evaluated for efficacy at 3 months after implant and safety at 6 months after implant. None of the sites participated in more than one study. Outcome measures included patient-reported percent of pain relief, patient satisfaction, quality of life improvement, pain evaluation (0 to 10 rating), pain relief rating, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, visual analog scale, the Short Form-36, and the total number of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

At 3 months after implantation of the permanent system, 75.4% of the patients (190/252) reported a 50% or greater pain relief as determined by the patient-reported degree of pain relief. Similarly, assessment of patient satisfaction with SCS therapy showed that 86.1% of patients (217/252) in all 4 studies were satisfied or very satisfied with the therapy at 3 months. In the 2 long-term studies, 80.9% of patients (140/173) were satisfied or very satisfied with the therapy at the 1-year evaluation point. Quality-of-life (QoL) data indicated that at 3 months after implant, 77.8% of patients (196/252) reported QoL as improved or greatly improved. Similarly, QoL was improved or greatly improved for 74.0% patients in the long-term study at 1 year (128/173). In the safety analysis, AEs were reviewed for all 4 studies. A total of 190 AEs were reported in 117 of 300 patients during all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides further evidence of the safety and effectiveness of SCS in treating chronic intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs. Specifically, it underscores a high level of effectiveness and acceptable safety concerns in the use of nonrechargeable SCS devices.

Для цитирования: Slavin Konstantin V, Vaisman Julien, Pollack Kenneth L, Simopoulos Thomas T, Kowlowitz Edward, Weinand Martin E, Norregaard Thorkild V, Genesis Study Investigators. Treatment of chronic, intractable pain with a conventional implantable pulse generator: a meta-analysis of 4 clinical studies.. The Clinical journal of pain. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0b013e318247309a.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.