MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/mus.25200

Медицинская библиотека · Muscle & nerve · 2016

Utility of maximum perfusion intensity as an ultrasonographic marker of intraneural blood flow.

Borire Adeniyi A, Visser Leo H, Padua Luca, Colebatch James G, Huynh William, Simon Neil G, Kiernan Matthew C, Krishnan Arun V

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: We quantified intraneural blood flow (INBF) using perfusion measurement software (PixelFlux), and compared it with the qualitative method of counting blood vessels (vessel score) in a cohort of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients (67 wrists) with a clinical and electrophysiological diagnosis of CTS, and 20 healthy controls (40 wrists) were enrolled. Median nerve ultrasound (US) was performed at the carpal tunnel inlet to measure the cross-sectional area (CSA) and vessel score. Power Doppler sonograms from nerves with detectable INBF were processed with PixelFlux to obtain the maximum perfusion intensity (MPI).

RESULTS

Forty-nine percent of CTS patients had detectable INBF compared with none in the control group (P < 0.0001). MPI correlated significantly with vessel score (r = 0.945, P < 0.0001), CSA (r = 0.613, P < 0.0001), and electrophysiological severity (r = 0.440, P < 0.0001). MPI had higher intra- or interobserver reliability compared with vessel score (0.95 vs. 0.47).

CONCLUSION

MPI is a better method for quantification of INBF. Muscle Nerve, 2016 Muscle Nerve 55: 77-83, 2017.

Для цитирования: Borire Adeniyi A, Visser Leo H, Padua Luca, Colebatch James G, Huynh William, Simon Neil G, Kiernan Matthew C, Krishnan Arun V. Utility of maximum perfusion intensity as an ultrasonographic marker of intraneural blood flow.. Muscle & nerve. 2016. DOI: 10.1002/mus.25200.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.