Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2026
Three-Dimensional Effects of Two Minimally Invasive Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Techniques.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
da Rosa Bibiana Mello, Haas Orion Luiz, Bastos Rubens Martins, de Oliveira Rogério Belle, Hernández-Alfaro Federico, Valls-Ontañón Adaia, de Menezes Luciane Macedo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated, in three dimensions, the skeletal effects of two minimally invasive bone-anchored techniques for surgically assisted palatal expansion, with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction (PD) and nasal septum disinsertion (NSD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients were retrospectively selected from two centres and assigned to groups: G1 (without PD and NSD) and G2 (with PD and NSD). Cone-beam computed tomography scans were analysed before and after expansion, using landmarks to assess skeletal changes along the transverse (X), vertical (Y) and anteroposterior (Z) planes.
RESULTS: Both groups achieved significant transverse expansion, with no intergroup difference (p = 0.062). G1 showed significant anterior transverse asymmetry (1.4 ± 2.9 mm; p = 0.017). G2 exhibited significant inferior displacement (1.5 ± 1.6 mm right, 1.4 ± 1.5 mm left; p = 0.007, p = 0.009) and anterior displacement (0.8 ± 0.8 mm bilaterally; p = 0.005), although intergroup comparisons were not statistically significant (p = 0.071 and p = 0.075, respectively). Both groups showed downward displacement of the apices and incisal edges of the upper central incisors, along with mild anterior movement of the posterior nasal spine and dental landmarks.
CONCLUSION: The two techniques produced similar skeletal effects across all three-dimensional axes. A slight clockwise rotation of the maxilla was observed, consistent with previous reports on conventional surgically assisted maxillary expansion. Anterior asymmetry was significant in G1 and may warrant further investigation. Although some displacement tendencies were observed, current evidence does not indicate a clear advantage of one technique over the other.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients were retrospectively selected from two centres and assigned to groups: G1 (without PD and NSD) and G2 (with PD and NSD). Cone-beam computed tomography scans were analysed before and after expansion, using landmarks to assess skeletal changes along the transverse (X), vertical (Y) and anteroposterior (Z) planes.
RESULTS: Both groups achieved significant transverse expansion, with no intergroup difference (p = 0.062). G1 showed significant anterior transverse asymmetry (1.4 ± 2.9 mm; p = 0.017). G2 exhibited significant inferior displacement (1.5 ± 1.6 mm right, 1.4 ± 1.5 mm left; p = 0.007, p = 0.009) and anterior displacement (0.8 ± 0.8 mm bilaterally; p = 0.005), although intergroup comparisons were not statistically significant (p = 0.071 and p = 0.075, respectively). Both groups showed downward displacement of the apices and incisal edges of the upper central incisors, along with mild anterior movement of the posterior nasal spine and dental landmarks.
CONCLUSION: The two techniques produced similar skeletal effects across all three-dimensional axes. A slight clockwise rotation of the maxilla was observed, consistent with previous reports on conventional surgically assisted maxillary expansion. Anterior asymmetry was significant in G1 and may warrant further investigation. Although some displacement tendencies were observed, current evidence does not indicate a clear advantage of one technique over the other.