Introduction
Cancer remains one of the most significant global health challenges, with the persistently rising incidence and mortality rates creating substantial socioeconomic burdens on healthcare systems and society ( 1 , 2 ). Chemotherapy serves as cornerstone therapy in multimodal cancer treatment and has significantly improved patient survival outcomes. However, its clinical utility is often limited by substantial toxicities, particularly Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).
Approximately 40–80% of patients experience CINV ( 3 , 4 ), making it one of the most debilitating and treatment-limiting adverse effects. CINV is classified into five subtypes based on the timing: acute, delayed, anticipatory, breakthrough, and refractory ( 5 ). The underlying pathophysiology involves neurotransmitters such as serotonin (5-HT) and substance P, which stimulate the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) and vagal afferent pathways, ultimately activating the emetic center to initiate the vomiting reflex ( 6 , 7 ). CINV leads to serious clinical sequelae, including anorexia, malnutrition, electrolyte disturbances, and dehydration ( 8 ). Moreover, it contributes to chemotherapy non-adherence, unplanned hospital admissions, and significant socioeconomic burdens due to lost productivity and increased healthcare expenditures ( 9 ). Consequently, optimal CINV management has evolved from simple symptom relief to an essential component of comprehensive supportive care throughout chemotherapy.
Current treatment of CINV is mainly based on a risk-stratified, multidrug prophylactic egimen. Among these, the first-line therapy include oral antiemetics, such as 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, NK-1 receptor antagonists, corticosteroids, and the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine ( 7 , 10 ). Despite these interventions, approximately 30% of patients still experience breakthrough CINV ( 4 , 7 ), highlighting the limitations of existing pharmacotherapy. Beyond suboptimal efficacy, prolonged or combined use of antiemetics may cause adverse effects, such as weight gain. Additionally, high-cost targeted agents, such as NK-1 receptor antagonists, impose a significant economic burden on patients and healthcare systems ( 11 , 12 ). Given these challenges, integrating complementary adjuvant therapies with conventional antiemetics warrants further exploration.
Acupuncture, a widely used in Traditional Chinese Medicine, has garnered increasing interest as an adjunctive therapy for various conditions due to its favourable safety profile, cost-effectiveness, and high patient acceptability ( 13 ). While the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines include acupuncture as a recommended option for CINV management, its clinical efficacy remains a subject of ongoing debate ( 14 ). Early investigations proposed that electroacupuncture (EA) stimulation at specific acupoints could ameliorate CINV symptoms ( 15 ), a finding subsequently corroborated by several studies ( 16 ). Recent high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have further strengthened this evidence, demonstrating superior CINV control when EA is combined with standard antiemetic regimens ( 17 ). However, contradictory findings other studies reporting no significant benefit over conventional therapy alone have introduced uncertainty ( 18 ). These discrepancies may be attributable to methodological limitations, particularly concerning adequate blinding procedures, which merit careful scrutiny.
This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating CINV, with the intention of providing a reference for future clinical practice.
Method
This study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD420251102130. 1 The study process was conducted in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines ( 19 ).
Retrieval strategy
This study searched the following seven databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals Database. The literature search covered the period from the establishment of each database to 30 September 2025, with no language restrictions. The final search was performed on 1 October 2025. During the search process, two types of search terms were adopted: Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text keywords. These two could be used independently or in combination to optimize search effectiveness. The detailed retrieval strategy was presented in Figure 1 . Meanwhile, information on ongoing trials with unpublished data was obtained from clinical trial registration platforms such as the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) and Clinical Trials.gov was searched to obtain information on ongoing trials with unpublished data. For all potential literature, including relevant systematic reviews, researchers manually searched and sorted the reference lists to further identify additional relevant trials. If the literature contained incomplete data, the corresponding authors of the articles were contacted to provide the required additional information. The details of the search strategies for PubMed database are described in Table 1 .

Table 1
Retrieval strategy in PubMed.
| No. | Search items |
| #1 | Neoplasms [Mesh] |
| #2 | Tumors [Title/Abstract] OR Neoplasia [Title/Abstract] OR Neoplasias [Title/Abstract] OR Neoplasm [Title/Abstract] OR Tumor [Title/Abstract] OR Cancer [Title/Abstract] OR Cancers [Title/Abstract] OR Malignant Neoplasm [Title/Abstract] OR Malignancy [Title/Abstract] OR Malignancies [Title/Abstract] OR Malignant Neoplasms [Title/Abstract] OR Neoplasm, Malignant [Title/Abstract] OR Neoplasms, Malignant [Title/Abstract] |
| #3 | #1 OR #2 |
| #4 | Acupuncture [Mesh] OR Acupuncture Therapy [Mesh] |
| #5 | Acupuncture Treatment [Title/Abstract] OR Acupuncture Treatments [Title/Abstract] OR Treatment, Acupuncture [Title/Abstract] OR Therapy, Acupuncture [Title/Abstract] OR Acupotomy [Title/Abstract] OR Acupotomies [Title/Abstract] OR Electroacupuncture [Title/Abstract] OR electro acupuncture [Title/Abstract] OR acupuncture [Title/Abstract] OR Acupuncture Points [Title/Abstract] OR Acupuncture Point [Title/Abstract] OR Point, Acupuncture [Title/Abstract] OR Points, Acupuncture [Title/Abstract] OR Acupoints [Title/Abstract] OR Acupoint [Title/Abstract] OR P6 [Title/Abstract] OR P-6 [Title/Abstract] OR Meridians [Title/Abstract] OR Jing Luo [Title/Abstract] OR Luo, Jing [Title/Abstract] OR Jingluo [Title/Abstract] OR Ching Lo [Title/Abstract] |
| #6 | #4 OR #5 |
| #7 | Drug Therapy [Mesh] |
| #8 | Chemotherapy [Title/Abstract] OR Chemotherapies [Title/Abstract] OR Pharmacotherapy [Title/Abstract] OR Pharmacotherapies [Title/Abstract] OR Therapy, Drug [Title/Abstract] OR Drug Therapies [Title/Abstract] OR therapies, Drug [Title/Abstract] |
| #9 | #7 OR #8 |
| #10 | Vomiting [Mesh] |
| #11 | Emesis [Title/Abstract] OR nausea [Title/Abstract] OR retching [Title/Abstract] |
| #12 | #10 OR #11 |
| #13 | Randomized controlled trial [Filter] |
| #14 | #3 AND #6 AND #9 AND #12 AND #13 |
Inclusion criteria for literature
This study included literature meeting the following criteria: study design as RCT; participants as cancer patients at various stages of treatment; intervention as acupuncture therapy (including body acupuncture, auricular acupuncture, electroacupuncture, etc.); primary outcomes as the severity of nausea and vomiting assessed by validated tools. In the experimental group, the intervention might be acupuncture alone or acupuncture combined with conventional medications, while the control group received conventional medication treatment, or conventional medications combined with sham acupuncture. Therapies such as moxibustion, acupressure, acupoint injection, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) were excluded.
Outcome measures
This study’s primary outcome measures of this study included the incidence, severity, and frequency of nausea and vomiting, as well as validated scale scores such as the Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching (RINVR), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30), and the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale.
Literature screening, data extraction, and bias analysis
After importing all the retrieved literature into EndNote software, two researchers (Chen Jiongli, Xu Fangyue) performed a duplicate removal exercise independently of each other. Then they conducted a preliminary screening of the remaining literature’s titles and abstracts. For literature deemed potentially eligible for inclusion after the preliminary screening, the full texts were further obtained and carefully reviewed. In the event of disagreements during the screening process, a third researcher (Li Rongrong) made the final decision. The overall process of literature retrieval and screening was shown in Figure 1 .
Data extraction for this study was carried out independently by two researchers. The extracted content included publication information (first author, year of participant, country of publication), study design (sample size, age of participants, gender of participants, cancer type, grouping, control conditions, blinding), acupuncture protocol (acupoints used, number of treatments, treatment duration and frequency, intervention methods such as electroacupuncture, fire acupuncture and conventional acupuncture, etc.), and outcome measures. All of the above information was recorded in a standardized data extraction form. If the data reported in the literature was insufficient, the research team would take the initiative to contact the authors of the articles to obtain Supplementary material .
Two researchers independently assessed the risk of bias of the included literature using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool ( 20 ). This assessment covered random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessors, completeness of outcome data, selective reporting of results, and other potential sources of bias. Based on the results of this assessment, the literature was classified into one of three categories: ‘low risk of bias’, ‘high risk of bias’, or ‘unclear risk of bias’.
Data analysis and result synthesis
We used R Project for statistical analysis and graph plotting. Based on observations from clinical practice, we adopted a random-effects model for all comparisons, taking into account potential clinical and methodological heterogeneity among different acupuncture treatment approaches. For continuous data, the statistical methods of mean difference (MD) statistical method was used. The risk ratio (RR) was applied to the analysis of dichotomous data. Meanwhile, the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both the treatment and control groups. When trials included two types of acupuncture and control methods (e.g., acupuncture versus electroacupuncture versus no treatment), the data from the two acupuncture groups were split into two separate studies for analysis.
Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. If the I 2 value was less than 50%, a fixed-effects model was employed for data synthesis; if the I 2 value exceeded 50%, this indicated significant heterogeneity. Potential causes were explored from both clinical and methodological perspectives, and explanations were provided or subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted. When more than 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis, funnel plots were used to detect publication bias. If fewer than 10 studies were included, all studies were reviewed, and the results synthesized narratively.
Certainty of evidence
GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used to evaluate the reliability of the evidence. In accordance with the GRADE guidelines ( 21 ), the quality of the evidence was initially graded as ‘high’, but was progressively downgraded based on factors such as risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. Evidence grading was completed jointly by two researchers (Chen Jiongli, Zhang Lingyu). The GRADE assessment indicated that the overall quality of the results in this study was low. All outcomes were classified as moderate or low quality: the incidence of vomiting and nausea was rated as moderate certainty of evidence; the severity of vomiting and nausea were rated as low certainty of evidence; and the frequency of vomiting and nausea was rated as very low certainty.
Result
Characteristics of the study results
1,793 potentially relevant studies were retrieved. After removing duplicates ( n = 405), 1,199 articles were excluded by reviewing titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening of the remaining 186 articles. Ultimately, 49 RCTs ( 17 , 18 , 22–68 ) met the inclusion criteria. The general characteristics of the included studies is shown in Table 2 . The results of the GRADE assessment is shown in Table 3 . Most studies (92%, n = 45) were conducted in China, while the remainder were completed in the United States ( n = 1) ( 67 ), Germany ( n = 2) ( 64 , 65 ), and Australia ( n = 1) ( 68 ). Patient age ranged from 20 to 80 years, with sample size range from 12 to 127. Nine different acupuncture modalities were used to treat CINV in this study, including conventional acupuncture, electroacupuncture, wrist-ankle acupuncture, umbilical acupuncture, auricular acupuncture, fire acupuncture, intradermal acupuncture, and warm needle acupuncture. 30 studies used manual acupuncture with filiform needles, 10 studies combined electroacupuncture ( 17 , 27–31 , 44 , 49 , 57 , 68 ), and one study combined acupuncture with thermotherapy ( 22 ). This covers a variety of acupuncture modalities and treatment protocols. Seven studies used sham acupuncture as the control group ( 17 , 18 , 27 , 41 , 46 , 65 , 68 ). Sixty-six distinct acupoints were utilized for CINV treatment, focusing on points along the Pericardium Meridian of Hand-Jueyin, Stomach Meridian of Foot-Yangming, and Conception Vessel. The three most frequently used acupoints were ST36, PC6, and CV12. Treatment was mostly administered once daily; session duration varied, with 30 min being the most common; and the treatment course ranged from 1 day to 20 weeks, with 14 studies lasting 3 days and 12 studies lasting 5 days.
Table 2
Characteristics of included systematic reviews on acupuncture for CINV in cancer patients.
TG, Treatment Group; CG, Control Group; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; MAT, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool; WHOQOL, World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument; FLIE, Functional Living Index – Emesis; RINVR, Rhodes Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching; FACT-G, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General.
| Study ID | Sample size | Type of cancer | Intervention | Course of treatment | Acupoints | Instruments used |
| 1 | TG:62 CG:58 | Breast cancer, malignant ovarian tumors, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, lung cancer | TG: Acupuncture + Conventional therapy CG: Sham acupuncture + COnventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, RN12, PC6, ST25, RN6, LR3 | ECOG-PS; effective rate |
| 2 | TG:30 CG:30 | Not report | TG: Warm acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day, totally 6 days | LI4, ST36, PC6 | Effective rate |
| 3 | TG:70 CG:70 | Breast cancer | TG: Abdominal acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, twice a day, totally 3 days | RN12, RN10, RN6, RN4, ST25, SP15, ST24 | Effective rate |
| 4 | TG:49 CG:47 | Lung cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day. During the retention period, the needle is inserted every 10 min | ST36, RN12, PC6 | KPS; effective rate |
| TG:44 CG:47 | Lung cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min,once a day. During the retention period, the needle is inserted every 10 min | ST36, RN12, PC6 | KPS; effective rate | |
| 5 | TG:27 CG:25 | Tumors of the respiratory, digestive, urinary, reproductive and musculoskeletal systems | TG: Auricular acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, three times a day | CO6, CO2, CO4 | Effective rate |
| 6 | TG:27 CG:25 | Lung cancer, gastric cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, osteosarcoma, kidney cancer, bile duct cancer, esophageal cancer | TG: Auricular acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, twice a day | The point of the vagus nerve of the ear, the point above the vagus nerve of the ear | Effective rate |
| 7 | TG:38 CG:34 | Lung cancer, gastric cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, osteosarcoma, kidney cancer, bile duct cancer, esophageal cancer | TG: Electroacupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Sham electroacupuncture+ Conventional therapy | 1 h, twice a day | PC6, PC5 | Frequency and degree of nausea and vomiting; Effective rate |
| 8 | TG:30 CG:30 | Not report | TG: Electroacupuncture CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, RN12, PC6 | R-INVR |
| 9 | TG:40 CG:40 | Breast cancer | TG: Electroacupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 20 min, once a day | LI4, PC6, ST36 | Degree of vomiting and nausea |
| 10 | TG:30 CG:30 | Lung cancer, stomach cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, ovarian cancer, rectal cancer, colon cancer, maxillary sinus cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, breast cancer, cervical cancer, esophageal cancer, pancreatic cancer, cardia cancer | TG: Electroacupuncture CG: Conventional therapy | 20 min, once a day | ST36, PC6, RN12, SP6 | Effective rate |
| 11 | TG:127 CG:119 | Not report | TG: Electroacupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36 | Effective rate |
| 12 | TG:33 CG:33 | Lung cancer, liver cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | EX-HN1, DU24, EX-HN3, HT7, SP6, ST36, RN12, PC6 | KPS; WHO-QLQ-C30; degree of vomiting and nausea |
| 13 | TG:30 CG:30 | Not report | TG: Acupuncture CG: Conventional therapy | 50 min, twice a day | SP4, PC6, RN12, BL20, BL21 | Effective rate |
| 14 | TG:20 CG:20 | Not report | TG: Acupuncture+ Conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, twice a day | PC6, ST36, LI4, LV3, ST40 | Effective rate; KPS |
| 15 | TG:33 CG:36 | Breast cancer | TG: Fire needle+ Conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | Each acupoint should be pricked 7 times each time, for a total of 3 times | ST36, CV12, LU5, PC6, SP4, SP1, ST45 | Effective rate; MAT |
| 16 | TG:28 CG:28 | Breast cancer | TG: Intradermal needling + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | The frequency of needle lifting replacement is once every 24 h. The acupuncture points on both sides are alternately buried. Press the acupoints for 30 min before the start of chemotherapy drug infusion, 30 min after the end of infusion, and for 30 s every hour | LI4, ST36, P6 | Effective rate; FLIE; duration of vomiting and nausea |
| 17 | TG:30 CG:30 | Intestinal cancer | TG: Intradermal needling + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | The frequency of needle replacement is once every 48 h. 30 min before the start of chemotherapy drug infusion and 30 min after the end of infusion, press the acupoints for 2 min | LI4, PC6 | Effective rate |
| 18 | TG:31 CG:30 | Breast cancer | TG: Acupuncture CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a week | PC6, ST36, PC6, ST21, LV14, RN17, ST25, RN7, RN4, LV3, BL2, DU20, DU23, LI11, EX-HN3, LI4, SI11, DU14, BL18, DU4, BL20, DU1 | Effective rate; KPS; WHO-QLQ-30 |
| 19 | TG:24 CG:24 | Breast cancer | TG: Intradermal needling + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | The frequency of changing the lifting needle is once every 48 h, with intermittent kneading | LI4, ST36, PC6, LV3 | Effective rate; duration of vomiting and nausea |
| 20 | TG:30 CG:30 | Not report | TG: Wrist-ankle acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | Wrist ankle acupuncture upper 1st zone\upper 2nd zone (PC 6) | Effective rate; FLIE |
| 21 | TG:55 CG:56 | Not report | TG: Wrist-ankle acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Sham wrist and ankle acupuncture+ Conventional therapy | Retained for 20 h | Wrist ankle acupuncture upper 1st zone | R-INVR; KPS |
| 22 | TG:30 CG:31 | Not report | TG: Acupuncture+ Conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, RN12, PC6 | R-INVR; FACT-G; Traditional Chinese Medical Syndrome Scoring table for gastrointestinal diseases |
| 23 | TG:81 CG:80 | Gastric cancer | TG: Acupuncture + Conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, RN12, PC6, ST25, SP4, BL20, BL21 | WHO-QLQ-30; Effective rate; Degree of vomiting and nausea |
| 24 | TG:44 CG:44 | Liver cancer | TG: Electroacupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 20 min before the treatment | KI1 | Effective rate; ECOG-PS |
| 25 | TG:29 CG:30 | Lung cancer | TG: Acupuncture+ Conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, RN12, PC6, ST25 | Effective rate; KPS; Degree of vomiting and nausea |
| 26 | TG:27 CG:30 | Lung cancer, breast cancer, gynecological malignancies | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Sham acupuncture + conventional therapy | 30 min, twice on the first day and once a day thereafter | ST36, RN12, PC6, ST25, LV13, RN6 | ECOG-PS; traditional Chinese medicine symptom scoring scale |
| 27 | TG:32 CG:32 | Breast cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36 | KPS; effective rate |
| 28 | TG:31 CG:12 | Lung cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, bone and flesh rumen cancer, liver cancer | TG: Acupuncture CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, 1–2 times a day | ST36, RN12, PC6 | Degree of vomiting and nausea; effective rate |
| 29 | TG:48 CG:30 | Breast cancer, stomach cancer, esophageal cancer, lung cancer, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer | T: Electroacupuncture C: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, RN12, PC6 | Degree of vomiting and nausea; effective rate |
| 30 | TG:33 CG:33 | Lung cancer, ovarian cancer, rectal cancer, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, gallbladder cancer, thymic cancer, colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, bone cancer, hypopharyngeal cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, PC6, RN21, RN17 | KPS; traditional Chinese medicine symptom scoring scale; effective rate |
| 31 | TG:43 CG:43 | Lung cancer, breast cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min. Twice on the first day and once a day thereafter | ST36, RN12, PC6, ST25, RN6, LV13 | Traditional Chinese medicine symptom scoring scale; effective rate |
| 32 | TG:25 CG:25 | Lung cancer, breast cancer, esophageal cancer, stomach cancer, intestinal cancer, ovarian cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, PC6, SP4, SP3, HT7 | KPS; effective rate |
| 33 | TG:46 CG:48 | Gastric cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, RN12, PC6, ST25, SP6, SP4 | KPS; effective rate |
| 34 | TG:35 CG:35 | Not report | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 20–30 min, once a day | ST36, ST41, ST43, ST44, ST45 | FLIE; effective rate |
| 35 | TG:38 CG:48 | Lung cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, three times a day | ST36, RN12, PC6 | Degree of vomiting and nausea; effective rate; duration of vomiting |
| 36 | TG:21 CG:21 | Nasopharynx cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, three times a week | ST21, ST25, ST36, RN10, RN12, RN13, RN17, BL2, LI4, PC6, SP4, Tu Shui point, Kai PI point, umbilical needle (Gen and Dui needles) | Degree of vomiting and nausea; effective rate; KPS |
| 37 | TG:50 CG:50 | Lung cancer | TG: Electroacupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36 | Effective rate |
| 38 | TG:38 CG:42 | Lung cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36 | Effective rate |
| 39 | TG:25 CG:25 | Lung cancer, breast cancer, gynecological malignancies | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min. Twice on the first day and once a day thereafter | ST36, RN12, PC6, SP4, ST40 | Effective rate |
| 40 | TG:30 CG:30 | Ovarian cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional | 30 min, once a day | ST36, ST21, RN12, KI21 | KPS; MAT; traditional Chinese medicine symptom scoring scale |
| 41 | TG:44 CG:43 | Lung cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, mediastinal neuroendocrine cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional | 30 min, once a day | ST36, RN12, PC6 | Effective rate |
| 42 | TG:107 CG:105 | Not report | TG: Wrist-ankle acupuncture CG: Conventional therapy | 2 h, once a day | The upper 1st zone on both sides, the lower left 1st zone, and the lower left 2nd zone | FLIE; effective rate |
| 43 | TG:28 CG:28 | Lung cancer | TG: Acupuncture + Conventional therapy C: Conventional therapy | 2 h, once a day | ST36 | Effective rate |
| 44 | TG:23 CG:23 | Ewing’s sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, osteosarcoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, synovial sarcoma | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | Each time for 20–45 min | ST36, RN12, PC6, LI4 | Dosage of antiemetic drugs; episodes of nausea and vomiting |
| 45 | TG:41 CG:39 | Multiple myeloma, breast cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, lipomatosis, Hodgkin’s lymphoma | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Placebo acupuncture + conventional therapy | 20 min, once a day | PC6 | Effective rate |
| 46 | TG:28 CG:28 | Gastric cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 30 min, once a day | ST36, ST25, PC6, SP6, GB21 | WHO-QOL-100; episodes of vomiting |
| 47 | TG:119 CG:116 | Breast cancer | TG: Electroacupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Sham electroacupuncture + conventional therapy | 15 or 30 min, once a day | ST36, PC6, LI4 | Effective rate |
| 48 | TG:37 CG:33 | Breast cancer | TG: Acupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Conventional therapy | 20 min, once a day | ST36 | Episodes of vomiting |
| 49 | TG:14 CG:16 | Breast cancer | TG: Electroacupuncture + conventional therapy CG: Sham electroacupuncture + Conventional therapy | 20 min, 2 days before each cycle, once a day | ST36, PC6, LI4 | MAT; EFFECTIVE rate |
Table 3
GRADE summary of findings table.
CI, Confidence Interval; MD, Mean Difference; RR, Risk Ratio. a Complete blinding cannot be achieved in acupuncture studies. Fourteen studies did not blind participants, operators, or outcome assessors, while the blinding status for participants, operators, and outcome assessors was unclear in most studies ( n = 32). Additionally, allocation concealment status was unclear in some studies. b Insufficient number of included studies. c Complete blinding cannot be achieved in acupuncture studies. Eleven studies did not blind participants, operators, or outcome assessors, while the blinding status for participants, operators, and outcome assessors was unclear in most studies ( n = 35). Additionally, allocation concealment status was unclear in some studies. d High heterogeneity with a p < 0.001.
| No of studies | Study design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other considerations | Acupuncture alone or acupuncture combined with standard medication | Standard medication alone or standard medication combined with sham acupuncture | Relative (95%CI) | Absolute (95%CI) | Certainty |
| Vomiting percentage | |||||||||||
| 47 | Randomized trials | Serious a | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | None | 361/1,952 (18.5%) | 590/1,896 (31.1%) | RR 0.57 (0.49–0.67) | 134 fewer per 1,000 (from 159 fewer to 103 fewer) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate a |
| Frequency of vomiting | |||||||||||
| 4 | Randomized trials | Serious b | Very serious b | Not serious | Not serious | None | 118 | 114 | – | MD 3.71 lower (6.29 lower to 1.13 lower) | ⨁◯◯◯ Very low b |
| Vomiting severity | |||||||||||
| 8 | Randomized trials | Serious b | Very serious b | Not serious | Not serious | None | 435 | 404 | – | MD 0.92 lower (1.57 lower to 0.28 lower) | ⨁◯◯◯ Very low b |
| Nausea percentage | |||||||||||
| 33 | Randomized trials | Serious c | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | None | 310/1,381 (22.4%) | 564/1,356 (41.6%) | RR 0.55 (0.45–0.66) | 187 fewer per 1,000 (from 229 fewer to 141 fewer) | ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate c |
| Frequency of nausea | |||||||||||
| 2 | Randomized trials | Serious b | Very serious b | Not serious | Not serious | None | 67 | 69 | – | MD 2.5 lower (5.91 lower to 0.91 higher) | ⨁◯◯◯ Very low b |
| Nausea severity | |||||||||||
| 8 | Randomized trials | Serious b | Serious d | Not serious | Not serious | None | 315 | 307 | – | MD 0.95 lower (1.43 lower to 0.47 lower) | ⨁⨁◯◯ Low b,d |
Risk of bias in studies
Regarding selection bias, the random sequence generation process was adequate and appropriate in 46 studies (94%). The randomization process was unclear in the remaining three studies (6%) ( 48 , 51 , 53 ): these studies claimed to be “randomized” but did not report the method used for generating the random sequence. Allocation concealment was implemented in 21 studies (43%), while it was unclear in the remaining 28 studies (57%). Due to patients and acupuncturists being unable to be blinded during acupuncture treatment, no fully double-blind trials were identified among the included literature. Only 15 studies (31%) ( 17 , 18 , 23 , 31 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 41 , 42 , 46 , 47 , 65–68 ) involved blinded third-party assessors or used sham acupuncture as a control group to blind patients; however these methods carried a high risk of unblinding. Four studies (8%) ( 32 , 52 , 56 , 64 ) did not employ any blinding methods, and the blinding status was unclear in 30 studies (61%). Attrition bias was low in all studies, as participant loss to follow-up was controlled within a reasonable range. The conclusions of all the included studies were consistent with the reported outcome measures, with no selective reporting of results. No other potential sources of bias were identified in the other studies (as shown in Figure 2 ).

Therapeutic effect of acupuncture for CINV
The pooled statistics from the meta-analysis on acupuncture for the control of CINV are summarized below. Funnel plot analysis revealed the presence of publication bias among the included studies. The trim-and-fill method was applied to correct the results and fill in the missing data. Following correction, the effect size of acupuncture for CINV control increased, and the 95% CI remained to the left of the effect line, indicating statistical significance. This had no impact on the overall conclusions of the study. Additionally, significant heterogeneity was observed across some studies. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of this study’s results.
Therapeutic effect of vomiting
The funnel plot of vomiting incidence indicated a certain degree of publication bias, which remained within an acceptable range ( Figure 3a ). By contrast, the number of studies reporting vomiting severity and vomiting frequency was small ( n < 10), and the asymmetric distribution of data points suggested the presence of high publication bias and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies ( Figures 3b , c ). After treatment, the incidence of vomiting (RR = 0.583, 95% CI: 0.523–0.650, p = 0.0031, I 2 = 39.9%, moderate certainty of evidence) ( Figure 4a ), vomiting severity score (MD = −0.839, 95% CI: −1.256 to −0.422, p < 0.0001, I 2 = 88.8%, low certainty of evidence) ( Figure 4b ), and vomiting frequency(MD = −3.704, 95% CI: −6.256 to −1.152, p < 0.0001, I 2 = 97.1%, very low certainty of evidence) ( Figure 4c ), all demonstrated that all MD values and 95% CIs fell on the same side of the null line. This indicated that acupuncture may control vomiting symptoms and has a therapeutic effect. However, significant heterogeneity was observed in the frequency and severity of vomiting. Due to the insufficient number of included studies, a subgroup analysis could not be performed; therefore, a sensitivity analysis was conducted, while the results revealed that excluding any single study did not result in substantially change in the overall pooled effect, as illustrated in Figure 5 .



Therapeutic effect of nausea
As shown in the funnel plot, there was a certain degree of publication bias in the incidence of nausea, while the heterogeneity among studies remained within an acceptable range ( Figure 6a ). Studies reporting nausea severity may be at a relatively high risk of publication bias or heterogeneity; therefore, the reliability of their results should be interpreted with caution ( Figure 6b ). Regarding nausea: the incidence of nausea (RR = 0.532, 95% CI: 0.432–0.655, p < 0.0001, I 2 = 68.0%; moderate certainty of evidence) ( Figure 7a ) and severity score (MD = −0.895, 95% CI: −1.273 to −0.516, p < 0.0001, I 2 = 84.4%; low certainty of evidence) ( Figure 7b ), these findings indicated that acupuncture intervention could control nausea. Additionally, subgroup analysis could not be conducted for nausea severity, as the number of included studies was fewer than 10. To determine the impact of each study on the results, a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was conducted. The results demonstrated that the findings for nausea severity were robust, whereas the stability of the results for nausea frequency was poor ( Figure 8 ).



Subgroup analysis
Given that I 2 > 50% in the above results, a subgroup analysis was performed for the incidence of nausea. The results showed that the pooled effect of studies published before 2010 (RR = 0.511, 95% CI: 0.406–0.643, p < 0.0001, I 2 = 72.2%) was significant with high heterogeneity, while the pooled effect of studies published after 2010 (RR = 0.645, 95% CI: 0.392–1.062, p = 0.2709, I 2 = 22.5%) was non-significant with low heterogeneity ( Figure 9 ); no statistically significant difference was observed between the subgroups, but still indicated that acupuncture intervention can reduce risk of nausea. Additional subgroup analyses were performed based on the severity and frequency of vomiting. In terms of vomiting severity, there was no statistically significant difference among subgroups ( p = 0.4954), with high heterogeneity across all subgroups ( Supplementary Figure 1 ). Regarding vomiting frequency, no significant inter-subgroup difference was observed ( p = 0.8709), and low heterogeneity was detected in the acupuncture group ( I 2 = 0%) ( Supplementary Figure 2 ). Subgroup analyses were also conducted for the incidence and severity of nausea. For nausea incidence, there were no statistically significant differences in therapeutic effects among different intervention subgroups ( p = 0.432), with low heterogeneity in the acupuncture group ( I 2 = 61.2%) ( Supplementary Figure 3 ). In terms of nausea severity, no significant difference was found between subgroups ( p = 0.8599), and the acupuncture group presented low heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%) ( Supplementary Figure 4 ). Except for the subgroup analysis of nausea incidence, the total number of included studies in the other three subgroup analyses was less than 10. Therefore, the clinical validity of the corresponding results should be interpreted with caution.

Discussion
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that acupuncture as an adjunctive therapy improves the complete response rate for CINV compared with conventional treatment alone, although it cannot completely replace pharmacotherapy.
Based on the RCTs currently, this review provides a relatively comprehensive body of evidence for the efficacy of acupuncture in preventing CINV. A total of 49 studies involving 4,133 participants were included. While previous systematic reviews have evaluated the effectiveness of non-penetrative modalities such as moxibustion, acupressure and TENS for CINV ( 69–71 ), the present study is the first to restrict its scope strictly to acupuncture therapy itself. Our findings suggest that acupuncture can reduce the incidence, frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting following chemotherapy. However, biases exist in blinding procedures, allocation concealment and outcome assessment, which compromise the reliability of the results. Compared with a prior systematic review and meta-analysis focusing on acupuncture ( 72 ), our findings are consistent with those review’s conclusions regarding antiemetic efficacy, with both demonstrating beneficial effects. Nevertheless, a discrepancy emerges regarding the alleviation of nausea: our study confirms that acupuncture can also alleviate post-chemotherapy nausea, which differs from the outcomes of the aforementioned research. This discrepancy may stem from the intrinsic differences between nausea and vomiting. Nausea is a subjective sensation, influenced by individual and psychological factors, making it difficult to measure objectively ( 73 ). In contrast, vomiting is an objective event, and its occurrence can easily be determined. The efficacy of interventions targeting vomiting can therefore be more readily assessed ( 74 ). For this reason, clinical studies often measure vomiting more frequently than nausea ( 75 ), and patients tend to confuse nausea with other types of gastric discomfort when reporting symptoms. Furthermore, inadequate blinding designs (e.g., unblinding caused by interactions between patients and acupuncturists) can particularly interfere with the assessment of subjective outcomes such as nausea. This may be a key factor contributing to inconsistent results across studies. In conclusion, future studies must adopt validated disease-specific scales for the targeted nausea assessment ( 76 , 77 ) and the rigorously implement of blinding protocols are crucial for future studies to yield more reliable conclusions.
The results of the remaining four studies showed high heterogeneity, warranting subgroup analysis, except for the incidence of vomiting. However, subgroup analysis could only be performed for the incidence of nausea ( n = 32). As there were fewer than 10 studies included for the three outcomes (i.e., frequency of vomiting, severity of vomiting, and severity of nausea), subgroup analysis was not feasible. Therefore, sensitivity analysis was conducted for these four outcomes to verify the robustness of the results.
This study identified ST36, PC6, and CV12 as the predominant acupoints in CINV management, accounting for the majority of selections among 66 documented points. This consistent clinical preference is supported by both data mining evidence ( 78 ) and well-characterized physiological mechanisms. ST36 primarily exerted its effects through peripheral modulation of gastrointestinal motility via muscarinic ( M 2/ M 3) and adrenergic ( β 1/ β 2) receptor activation ( 79–83 ). Additionally, PC6 demonstrated comparable efficacy to pharmacological antiemetics ( 84 , 85 ) through its unique ability to modulate key neurotransmitters-simultaneously elevating β -endorphin levels in cerebrospinal fluid while reducing peripheral 5-HT concentrations ( 86 , 87 ). CV12 regulated the level of serum 5-HT and relieved gastrointestinal smooth muscle spasm, serving as a pivotal acupoint for the treatment of various digestive disorders ( 88 ). The above acupoints can stimulate the activities of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves, regulates the secretion of neurotransmitters (5-HT, β -endorphin), regulates gastrointestinal motility and nerve conduction, and regulates the brain-gut connection, thereby alleviating and exerting the antiemetic effect ( 89–91 ).
The present study has three distinct strengths. First, our analysis focused exclusively on acupuncture therapy without incorporating other adjunctive treatments, which minimized the potential confounding effects and thus provided more reliable clinical evidence for the efficacy of acupuncture in CINV management. Second, this study systematically summarized the selection principles of therapeutic acupoints and meridians, which is conducive to developing more optimized clinical protocols for CINV. In addition to synthesizing the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of acupuncture for CINV, this systematic review employed the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was performed to determine whether the results varied with predefined explanatory variables.
Nevertheless, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, at the data level, some included studies failed to distinguish between acute and delayed CINV—the latter is generally more severe and refractory to control ( 92 ). To ensure consistency, we extracted data at the end of treatment, based on the principle that the intervention group demonstrated a relatively high control rate. This practice may have introduced bias in estimating acupuncture’s efficacy. This practice might have led to biases in the estimation of acupuncture efficacy. Second, in the evidence grading process, the quality of evidence was downgraded due to identified high risks of bias, imprecision or inconsistency in results, which may have collectively contributed to a conservative estimation of the actual effect of acupuncture; Methodologically, as a complex intervention, acupuncture poses inherent challenges to the implementation of adequate blinding of patients and practitioners in RCTs ( 93 ). Methodological limitations were noted regarding blinding procedures in the included studies, with only 7% ( n = 49) implementing adequate participant blinding. While sham acupuncture represents the current standard control in acupuncture trials, emerging evidence suggests it may exert physiological effects that complicate the interpretation of placebo responses ( 94 ). This is particularly relevant for subjective outcomes such as nausea severity scores, where unblinded assessment may introduce measurement bias. Moreover, the baseline characteristics of the included studies revealed substantial heterogeneity in the scales employed to assess subjective nausea and vomiting outcomes. Importantly, no consensus has been established regarding the optimal selection of outcome measures. Such heterogeneity in measurement approaches reduces both the comparability of treatment effects across studies and the clinical interpretability of pooled results ( 95 , 96 ). Addationally, the subgroup analyses indicated that low heterogeneity of conventional acupuncture in key outcome indicators, including vomiting frequency, severity of nausea, and incidence of nausea. These findings indicated that despite technical discrepancies in manual acupuncture protocols, such interventions could yield more consistent antiemetic effects, which might be attributed to standardized acupoint selection (e.g., PC6, ST36) and comparable acupuncture manipulation across included trials. In contrast, high heterogeneity was observed for electroacupuncture across all outcomes, which was likely caused by uncontrollable confounding variables such as stimulation parameters (frequency and intensity), electrode placement and treatment duration.
Moreover, due to the poor quality of the included literature, the risk of inadequate allocation concealment and outcome assessment blinding was unclear. Regarding publication bias, the asymmetric funnel plots suggested that negative results might have been unpublished ( Figures 3 , 6 ). However, the Egger’s test could not be performed due to the small number of included studies ( n < 10). Additionally, the sample sizes for some outcome indicators, especially frequency and severity of vomiting and nausea, were too small, for subsequent subgroup analyses to be conducted following sensitivity analysis, resulting in imprecise effect estimates. Finally, while this study exclusively included randomized controlled trials, its must be noted that 92% of these were conducted in China. This geographic concentration raises important considerations regarding cultural context and patient expectations. Specifically, the higher cultural acceptance and familiarity with acupuncture in traditional Chinese medicine-practicing regions may systematically influence treatment outcomes through mechanisms such as enhanced placebo effects and practitioner-patient interactions. These factors may potentially affect both the magnitude and generalizability of our findings, particularly when applied to populations with different cultural backgrounds and healthcare systems. Hence, the generalizability of these findings to non-Chinese populations should be interpreted with caution due to potential cultural and expectancy-related confounders. Future international multicenter, high-quality RCTs are warranted to validate the efficacy of acupuncture across diverse populations.
Additionally, the NCCN categorizes chemotherapeutic agents into four emetogenic risk levels (high, moderate, low, minimal). While acupuncture may show significant efficacy in high-emetogenic-risk cases where conventional antiemetics often fail, its benefits could be limited in moderate- or low-risk settings ( 14 , 96 ). Chemotherapy regimens also contribute to baseline heterogeneity among patients, such as physical impairment, myelosuppression, and anemia, potentially increasing acupuncture-related safety risks ( 89 ). Thus, rigorously designed trials are needed to evaluate acupuncture’s safety and efficacy across varying chemotherapy protocols.
Conclusion
This study confirms that acupuncture is effective as an adjunctive therapy for CINV. While future large-scale, rigorously designed RCTs are warranted to further validate these findings, the current evidence provides a robust rationale for its integration into clinical practice.
Edited by: Xuancheng Zhou , Southwest Medical University, China
Reviewed by: Baoyou Huang , Wenzhou Medical University, China
Jingxuan Dai , Southwest Medical University, China
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251102130
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary material , further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
JC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Resources. FX: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Software. LZ: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. SH: Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Visualization. YX: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. QH: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. HC: Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Methodology. RL: Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2026.1774507/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Diao X Guo C Jin Y Li B Gao X Du X . Cancer situation in China: an analysis based on the global epidemiological data released in 2024 . Cancer Commun . ( 2024 ) 45 : 178 – 97 . doi: 10.1002/cac2.12627 , 39659114 PMC11833671
2. Hausman DM . What is Cancer? Perspect Biol Med . ( 2019 ) 62 : 778 – 84 . doi: 10.1353/pbm.2019.0046 , 31761807
3. Majem M de Las Peñas R Virizuela JA Cabezón-Gutiérrez L Cruz P Lopez-Castro R . SEOM clinical guideline emesis (2021) . Clin Transl Oncol . ( 2021 ) 24 : 712 – 23 . doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02802-1 , 35347571 PMC8986698
4. Piechotta V Adams A Haque M Scheckel B Kreuzberger N Monsef I . Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis . Cochrane Database Syst Rev . ( 2021 ) 2022 : Cd012775 . doi: 10.1002/14651858.cd012775.pub2 , 34784425 PMC8594936
5. Natale JJ . Overview of the prevention and management of CINV . Am J Manag Care . ( 2018 ) 24 : S391 – s7 . 30328690
6. Zhong W Shahbaz O Teskey G Beever A Kachour N Venketaraman V . Mechanisms of nausea and vomiting: current knowledge and recent advances in intracellular emetic signaling systems . Int J Mol Sci . ( 2021 ) 22 . doi: 10.3390/ijms22115797 , 34071460 PMC8198651
7. Gupta K Walton R Kataria SP . Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: pathogenesis, recommendations, and new trends . Cancer Treat Res Commun . ( 2021 ) 26 : 100278 . doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100278 , 33360668
8. Ballatori E Roila F . Impact of nausea and vomiting on quality of life in cancer patients during chemotherapy . Health Qual Life Outcomes . ( 2003 ) 1 : 46 . doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-46 , 14521717 PMC212194
9. Grassi L Berardi MA Ruffilli F Meggiolaro E Andritsch E Sirgo A . Role of psychosocial variables on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life among cancer patients: a European study . Psychother Psychosom . ( 2015 ) 84 : 339 – 47 . doi: 10.1159/000431256 , 26402426
10. Adel N . Overview of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and evidence-based therapies . Am J Manag Care . ( 2017 ) 23 : S259 – s65 . 28978206
11. Gyawali B Poudyal BS Iddawela M . Cheaper options in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting . J Glob Oncol . ( 2016 ) 2 : 145 – 53 . doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.002477 , 28717694 PMC5495455
12. Burke TA Wisniewski T Ernst FR . Resource utilization and costs associated with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy administered in the US outpatient hospital setting . Support Care Cancer . ( 2011 ) 19 : 131 – 40 . doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0797-x , 20101417
13. Wang CC Tan J-Y Williams A . Safety and side effects of acupuncture therapy in Australia: a systematic review . Eur J Integr Med . ( 2019 ) 27 : 81 – 9 . doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2019.03.004
14. Berger MJ . NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Antiemesis ( 2025 ). Available online at: https://www.nccn.org/ (Accessed October 1, 2025).
15. Ezzo J Vickers A Richardson MA Allen C Dibble SL Issell B . Acupuncture-point stimulation for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting . J Clin Oncol . ( 2005 ) 23 : 7188 – 98 . doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.028 , 16192603
16. Garcia MK McQuade J Haddad R Patel S Lee R Yang P . Systematic review of acupuncture in cancer care: a synthesis of the evidence . J Clin Oncol . ( 2013 ) 31 : 952 – 60 . doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.5818 , 23341529 PMC3577953
17. Shen G Ren D Zhao F Wang M Liu Z Feng X . Effect of adding electroacupuncture to standard triple antiemetic therapy on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized controlled clinical trial . J Clin Oncol . ( 2024 ) 42 : 4051 – 9 . doi: 10.1200/jco.24.00099 , 39241208
18. Li QW Yu MW Wang XM Yang GW Wang H Zhang CX . Efficacy of acupuncture in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with advanced cancer: a multi-center, single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical research . Chin Med . ( 2020 ) 15 : 57 . doi: 10.1186/s13020-020-00333-x , 32514290 PMC7268447
19. Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM Boutron I Hoffmann TC Mulrow CD . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews . Int J Surg . ( 2020 ) 88 : 105906 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906 , 33789826
20. Higgins JP Altman DG Gøtzsche PC Jüni P Moher D Oxman AD . The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials . BMJ . ( 2011 ) 343 : d5928 . doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928 , 22008217 PMC3196245
21. Balshem H Helfand M Schünemann HJ Oxman AD Kunz R Brozek J . GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence . J Clin Epidemiol . ( 2011 ) 64 : 401 – 6 . doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015 , 21208779
22. Wu CY Wu F Liu SG . Clinical study on ondansetron combined with warm acupuncture in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced vomiting in tumor patients . Modern Dist Educ Chin Tradit Med . ( 2020 ) 18 : 119 – 21 . doi: 10.3103/S1047197921020095
23. Lai ML Liu D . Therapeutic effect observation of Bo’s abdominal acupuncture on nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in breast cancer patients . J Math Med . ( 2015 ) 9 : 1295 – 6 . doi: 10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2019.93.168
24. Wang YL Li JX Gu XQ Fu RY Guan XJ . Effects of acupuncture intervention at different time points on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in lung cancer patients . Chin Acupunct . ( 2019 ) 39 : 1269 – 73 . doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2019.12.004 31820600
25. Xu Y . Clinical Observation on Electroacupuncture Stimulation of Auricular Vagus Nerve in Preventing and Treating Nausea and Vomiting after Chemotherapy for Malignant Tumors . Nanjing : Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine ( 2014 ).
26. Wang YP Zhu WJ Xu Y Zhou JZ . Clinical observation on electroacupuncture at auricular vagus nerve points in preventing and treating nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in patients with malignant tumors . Zhongguo Zhong Yi Ji Zhen . ( 2015 ): 24 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-745X.2015.02.038
27. Zhang X Fan YH . Effects of electroacupuncture at Neiguan (PC6) and Jianshi (PC5) on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting . Int J Tradit Chin Med . ( 2015 ) 1 : 25 – 8 . doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4246.2015.01.007
28. Min JH Wen Q Yi C Gong YL Li N . Electroacupuncture for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents: a research study . J Emerg Tradit Chin Med . ( 2017 ) 26 : 215 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-745X.2017.02.003
29. Chen M Pan YQ Lan YY . Effects of electroacupuncture on nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients with comorbid diabetes mellitus receiving chemotherapy: an observational study . Diabetes New World . ( 2018 ) 21 : 104 – 5 . doi: 10.16658/j.cnki.1672-4062.2018.04.104
30. Li BZ . A Clinical Study of Electroacupuncture in the Treatment of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Nausea and Vomiting . Beijing : Beijing University of Chinese Medicine ( 2008 ).
31. Duan QL Zhang DJ Zhang YM Wang LM Wang XG Xu GL . Electroacupuncture at Zusanli (ST36) for the treatment of chemo-therapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with malignant tumors: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial . Chinese Acupunct . ( 2009 ): 29 . doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2009.12.03 20088412
32. Xiao CH . A Clinical Study of Mind-Regulating Acupuncture in the Treatment of Platinum-Induced Nausea and Vomiting . Guangzhou : Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine ( 2022 ).
33. Yang Y Zhang X Zou W . Therapeutic observation of Hejiang Jiangni acupuncture on cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting . Heilongjiang Science and Technology Information . ( 2013 ) 1 : 75 .
34. Ren WJ Nie . Clinical efficacy of acupuncture based on the “spleen-awakening and mind-regulating method” for chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting. Chinese medical . Innovations . ( 2023 ) 20 : 98 – 101 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4985.2023.04.023
35. Jiao JY . Efficacy Observation and “Brain-Gut” Mechanism Study of Lingnan Fire Needling in the Intervention of CINV in Breast Cancer . Guangzhou : Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine ( 2022 ).
36. Lin YM Chen YQ Pan MY Wan QH . Efficacy observation of thumbtack acupuncture for improving chemo-therapy-induced nausea and vomiting in postoperative breast cancer patients . Forum of Basic Medical Sciences . ( 2021 ) 25 : 1634 – 6 . doi: 10.19435/j.1672-1721.2021.12.002
37. Wang JC Yin L . Clinical observation of thumbtack acupuncture for nausea and vomit-ing in colorectal cancer patients after chemotherapy . World Latest Med Inform Abstr . ( 2019 ) 19 : 275 – 9 . doi: 10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2019.93.168
38. Wang LL . A Clinical Study of Time-Space Acupuncture with the Eight Methods of the Intelligent Turtle for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting of Liver Qi Stagnation and Spleen Deficiency Pattern in Postoperative Breast Cancer Patients . Kunming : Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine ( 2020 ).
39. Zhang L . A Clinical Study of Thumbtack Acupuncture Intervention Based on Four Gates Points for Chemotherapy-Related Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer Patients . Beijing : Beijing University of Chinese Medicine ( 2022 ).
40. Wu QJ Li ZQ Peng XY . Efficacy observation of wrist-ankle acupuncture intervention for che-motherapy-related vomiting . Chin Prescript Drug . ( 2021 ) 19 : 125 – 6 .
41. Xu MJ Li B Huang F Xu X Zhou QH . A randomized controlled clinical study on wrist-ankle acupuncture combined with ondansetron in preventing and treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients . J Clin Acupunct Moxibustion . ( 2023 ) 39 : 16 – 21 . doi: 10.19917/j.cnki.1005-0779.023090
42. Chen GH . Clinical Observation of Gastric Three-Acupoint Therapy for Improving Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) Symptoms in Tumor Patients . Chengdu : Chengdu University of Chinese Medicine ( 2022 ).
43. Yang HN Chen K Li S Mi S Yu J . Preventive effect of warming and unblocking acupuncture at Zhongwan (CV 12) combined with conventional acupuncture on nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients . Liaoning J Tradit Chin Med . ( 2023 ) 50 : 159 – 63 . doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2023.01.043
44. Yang HN Chen K Li S Mi S Yu J . Preventive effect of warming and unblocking acupuncture at Zhongwan (CV 12) combined with conventional acupuncture on nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients . Liaoning J Tradit Chin Med. ( 2023 ) 50 : 159 – 63 .
45. Chen JB . Effect of Acupuncture on Nausea and Vomiting in Lung Cancer Patients after the First Cycle of Chemotherapy . Guangzhou : Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine ( 2016 ).
46. Li QW . A Clinical Study on Acupuncture for Preventing and Treating Nausea and Vomiting after Chemotherapy in Patients with Malignant Tumors . Beijing : Beijing University of Chinese Medicine ( 2016 ).
47. Li YK . A Clinical Study on Acupuncture for Preventing and Treating Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Breast Cancer Patients . Guangzhou : Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine ( 2012 ).
48. Que TS Lv JY Huang YQ Zhong JC . Clinical observation on acupuncture for preventing and treating CIV . Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibustion . ( 2003 ) 22 : 8 – 9 .
49. Wang Y Li XQ Sun GQ . Clinical observation of acupuncture for preventing and treating gastro-intestinal reactions during chemotherapy in 48 tumor patients . Chin Folk Ther . ( 2003 ) 2 : 14 – 5 . doi: 10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.2003.02.013
50. Liu T . A Clinical Study on Acupuncture at Anti-Reflux Point Combination for the Treatment of CINV . China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences : Beijing ( 2020 ).
51. Xiao B Wu DQ Bai XD Zhang N Wang XL . A clinical study on acupuncture combined with ondansetron for the treatment of CRNV in patients with malignant tumors undergoing transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy . Chin Med Innov . ( 2025 ) 22 : 1 – 5 . doi: 10.19621/j.cnki.11-3555/r.2003.02.013
52. Xu JT . Clinical Observation on the Efficacy of Acupuncture Combined with Ondansetron in the Treatment of CINV . Beijing : Beijing University of Chinese Medicine ( 2020 ).
53. Liu HG Zhao LL Yang PY Kong FM Jia YJ . Clinical observation on acupuncture combined with antiemetics for chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting in gastric cancer patients . Tianjin J Tradit Chin Med . ( 2024 ) 41 : 1246 – 50 . doi: 10.11656/j.issn.1672-1519.2024.10.05
54. Li RX . Clinical Observation on the Efficacy of Acupuncture at the Five Shu Points of the Stomach Meridian for Preventing and Treating CINV . Urumqi : Xinjiang Medical University ( 2024 ).
55. Xu YP Zhang LC Lin NL . Clinical observation on acupuncture at acupoints for preventing and treating chemotherapy-induced vomiting in cancer patients . J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med . ( 2008 ) 3 : 109 . doi: 10.13194/j.jlunivtcm.2008.03.111.xuyp.040
56. Lin JL . Clinical Observation on the Efficacy of Acupuncture for Treating CIV in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients . Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine ( 2022 ).
57. Yan BC Ding CQ Jiang P Li XS Wu CZ Zhang J . Phase III clinical study on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with conventional antiemetic therapy versus conventional antiemetic therapy alone for preventing CINV in lung cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens . Int Med Health Guid News . ( 2023 ) 29 : 1553 – 6 . doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2023.11.016
58. Wu BQ Chen FC Pan Q Xue JH Bao J . Clinical study on acupuncture at Zusanli (ST 36) for preventing and treating CIV in lung cancer patients . Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med . ( 2011 ) 29 : 406 – 8 . doi: 10.13193/j.archtcm.2011.02.184.wubq.002
59. Sun XL Li X . Acupuncture and moxibustion for post-chemotherapy vomiting in tumor patients and its effects on serum levels of GAS and MTL . Mod Med Health Res Electron J . ( 2020 ) 4 : 119 – 20 .
60. Li J . Clinical Observation on the Efficacy of Combined Acupuncture and Medication for Preventing and Treating CINV in Ovarian Cancer Patients . Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine ( 2016 ).
61. Wang S Geng L . A clinical study on syndrome differentiation-based acupuncture in the treatment of CINV in patients with different TCM syndromes . J Tradit Chin Med . ( 2017 ) 32 : 1853 – 6 . doi: 10.16368/j.issn.1674-8999.2017.10.487
62. Jiang XF He Z Chen X Chen L Li LX Zhang Q . Effect study of midnight-noon ebb-flow wrist-ankle acupuncture for preventing and treating CINV . J Nurs Adm . ( 2024 ) 24 : 180 – 4 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-315x.2024.02.018
63. Yang JH . Clinical efficacy observation of acupuncture at Zusanli (ST 36) for preventing and treating gastrointestinal reactions during chemotherapy . Mod J Integr Tradit Chin West Med . ( 2012 ) 21 : 1673 – 86 .
64. Gottschling S Reindi TK Meyer S Berrang J Henze G Graeber S . Acupuncture to alleviate chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric oncology - a randomized multicenter crossover pilot trial . Klin Padiatr . ( 2008 ) 220 : 365 – 70 . doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1086039 18949672
65. Streitberger K Friedrich-Rust M Bardenheuer H Unnebrink K Windeler J Goldschmidt H . Effect of acupuncture compared with placebo-acupuncture at P6 as additional antiemetic prophylaxis in high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a randomized controlled single-blind trial . Clin Cancer Res . ( 2003 ) 9 : 2538 – 44 . 12855628
66. Zhou J Fang L Wu WY He F Zhang XL Zhou X . The effect of acupuncture on chemotherapy-associated gastrointestinal symptoms in gastric cancer . Curr Oncol . ( 2017 ) 24 : E1 – 5 . doi: 10.3747/co.24.3296 , 28270726 PMC5330633
67. Shen JN Wenger N Glaspy J Hays RD Albert PS Choi C . Electroacupuncture for control of myeloablative chemotherapy-induced emesis - a randomized controlled trial . JAMA . ( 2000 ) 284 : 2755 – 61 . 11105182 10.1001/jama.284.21.2755
68. Beith JM Oh B Chatfield MD Davis E Venkateswaran R . Electroacupuncture for nausea, vomiting, and myelosuppression in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer: a randomized controlled pilot trial . Med Acupunct . ( 2012 ) 24 : 241 – 8 . doi: 10.1089/acu.2012.0876
69. Ying Y Wu H Chen X Zhou J Sun Y Fang L . Electrical acupoint stimulation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Heliyon . ( 2024 ) 10 : e30965 . doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30965 , 38799757 PMC11126857
70. Liu YL Li SS Yang YR Zhao YH Li WX Hao JX . Research progress on the molecular mechanism of electroacupuncture at "Zusanli" (ST36) for regulating gastrointestinal dysfunction . Zhen Ci Yan Jiu . ( 2023 ) 48 : 1048 – 54 . doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.20230184 , 37879956
71. Huang Z Qin Z Yao Q Wang Y Liu Z . Moxibustion for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and Meta-analysis . Evid Based Complement Alternat Med . ( 2017 ) 2017 : 9854893 . doi: 10.1155/2017/9854893 , 29234451 PMC5660813
72. Yan Y López-Alcalde J Zhang L Siebenhüner AR Witt CM Barth J . Acupuncture for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Cancer Med . ( 2023 ) 12 : 12504 – 17 . doi: 10.1002/cam4.5962 , 37226372 PMC10278514
73. Stern RM . The psychophysiology of nausea . Acta Biol Hung . ( 2002 ) 53 : 589 – 600 . doi: 10.1556/ABiol.53.2002.4.17 , 12501940
74. Hornby PJ . Central neurocircuitry associated with emesis . Am J Med . ( 2001 ) 111 : 106 – 12 . doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(01)00849-X , 11749934
75. Kenward H Pelligand L Savary-Bataille K Elliott J . Nausea: current knowledge of mechanisms, measurement and clinical impact . Vet J . ( 2015 ) 203 : 36 – 43 . doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.10.007 , 25453240
76. Semerci Şahin R Kucukkaya A Çakır GN Akdeniz Kudubeş A Goktas P . Measurement tools for assessing nausea, vomiting, and retching in pediatric populations: a scoping review . J Pediatr Nurs . ( 2025 ) 85 : 567 – 76 . doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2025.09.019 , 41014828
77. Wood JM Chapman K Eilers J . Tools for assessing nausea, vomiting, and retching . Cancer Nurs . ( 2011 ) 34 : E14 – 24 . doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181e2cd79 , 21188798
78. Li X Zhao C Shi JF . Acupoint selection rules in treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with acupuncture and moxibustion . World J Acupunct-Moxibustion . ( 2022 ) 32 : 149 – 56 . doi: 10.1016/j.wjam.2021.12.005
79. He M Lim XY Li J Li L Zhang T . Mechanisms of acupuncture at Zusanli (ST36) and its combinational acupoints for stress gastric ulcer based on the correlation between Zang-fu and acupoints . J Integr Med . ( 2025 ) 23 : 1 – 11 . doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2024.12.003 , 39736482
80. Zhang Z Yu Q Zhang X Wang X Su Y He W . Electroacupuncture regulates inflammatory cytokines by activating the vagus nerve to enhance antitumor immunity in mice with breast tumors . Life Sci . ( 2021 ) 272 : 119259 . doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119259 , 33636172
81. Oh JE Kim SN . Anti-inflammatory effects of acupuncture at ST36 point: a literature review in animal studies . Front Immunol . ( 2021 ) 12 : 813748 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.813748 , 35095910 PMC8790576
82. Huang W Long W Xiao J Zhao G Yu T . Effect of electrically stimulating acupoint, Zusanli (ST 36), on patient's recovery after laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial . J Tradit Chin Med . ( 2019 ) 39 : 433 – 9 . 32186016
83. Lu MJ Yu Z He Y Yin Y Xu B . Electroacupuncture at ST36 modulates gastric motility via vagovagal and sympathetic reflexes in rats . World J Gastroenterol . ( 2019 ) 25 : 2315 – 26 . doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i19.2315 , 31148903 PMC6529886
84. Lv JQ Li PC Zhou L Tang WF Li N . Acupuncture at the P6 acupoint to prevent postoperative pain after craniotomy: a randomized, placebo-controlled study . Evid Based Complement Alternat Med . ( 2021 ) 2021 : 1 – 8 . doi: 10.1155/2021/6619855 , 33815553 PMC7994087
85. Lv JQ Feng RZ Li N . P6 acupoint stimulation for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing craniotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial . Trials . ( 2013 ) 14 : 153 . doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-153 , 23710881 PMC3668145
86. Shi K He F Tang Y Xiao X Zhang J Jin Y . Acupuncture PC6 for postoperative nausea and vomiting at different times: a protocol for systematic review and meta analysis . Medicine (Baltimore) . ( 2020 ) 99 : e20452 . doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020452 , 32481452 PMC12245216
87. Acar HV . Acupuncture and related techniques during perioperative period: a literature review . Complement Ther Med . ( 2016 ) 29 : 48 – 55 . doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.09.013 , 27912957
88. Zhang X Qiu H Li C Cai P Qi F . The positive role of traditional Chinese medicine as an adjunctive therapy for cancer . Biosci Trends . ( 2021 ) 15 : 283 – 98 . doi: 10.5582/bst.2021.01318 , 34421064
89. Kim SA Yeo S Lim S . Effectiveness and safety of acupuncture for nausea and vomiting in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Medicina (Kaunas) . ( 2025 ) 61 . doi: 10.3390/medicina61071287 , 40731916 PMC12300855
90. Chen J Tu Q Miao S Zhou Z Hu S . Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials . Int J Surg . ( 2020 ) 73 : 57 – 64 . doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.036 , 31704425
91. Dundee JW Ghaly G . Local anesthesia blocks the antiemetic action of P6 acupuncture . Clin Pharmacol Ther . ( 1991 ) 50 : 78 – 80 . doi: 10.1038/clpt.1991.106 , 1855355
92. Rapoport BL . Delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: pathogenesis, incidence, and current management . Front Pharmacol . ( 2017 ) 8 : 19 . doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00019 , 28194109 PMC5277198
93. Fei YT Cao HJ Xia RY Chai QY Liang CH Feng YT . Methodological challenges in design and conduct of randomised controlled trials in acupuncture . BMJ . ( 2022 ) 376 : e064345 . doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-064345 , 35217507 PMC8868049
94. Lin R Guo Z Zhang J Wang L Zhang L Tang X . Acupuncture for nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Front Neurol . ( 2025 ) 16 : 1692411 . doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1692411 , 41561337 PMC12812548
95. Convie LJ Clements JM McCain S Campbell J Kirk SJ Clarke M . Development of a core outcome set for informed consent for therapy: an international key stakeholder consensus study . BMC Med Ethics . ( 2022 ) 23 : 79 . doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00820-w , 35945581 PMC9364552
96. Reynolds KA Schlessinger DI Vasic J Iyengar S Qaseem Y Behshad R . Core outcome set for actinic keratosis clinical trials . JAMA Dermatol . ( 2020 ) 156 : 326 – 33 . doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4212 , 31939999