DOI 10.1007/s11255-023-03695-x
Can HALP score, a new prognostic tool, take the place of traditional scoring systems in Fournier's gangrene?
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Fournier's Gangrene (FG) is a fatal condition, therefore prognosis prediction is a crucial step before treatment planning. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of Hemoglobin, Albumin, Lymphocyte and Platelet (HALP) score which is frequently employed in vascular disorders and malignancies, on disease severity and survival in FG patients and to compare HALP score with well-known scoring systems on this aspect.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Eighty-seven men who had surgical debridement for FG between December 2006 and January 2022 were included in this study. Their symptoms, physical examination findings, laboratory tests, medical histories, vital signs, extent and timing of the surgical debridement and antimicrobial therapies were noted. The HALP score, Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) and Fournier's Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI) were evaluated for their predictive values for survival.
RESULTS
FG patients were grouped as survivors (Group 1, n = 71) and non-survivors (Group 2, n = 16) and the results were compared. The mean ages of survivors (59 ± 12.55 years) and non-survivors (64.5 ± 14.6 years) were similar (p = 0.114). The median size of necrotized body surface area was 3% in Group 1 and 4.8% in Group 2 (p = 0.013). On admission, hemoglobin, albumin and serum urea levels and white blood cell counts were significantly different in two study groups. Two study groups were similar for HALP scores. However, ACCI and FGSI scores were greater significantly in non-survivors.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicated that HALP score does not predict a survival successfully in FG. However, FGSI and ACCI are successful outcome predictors in FG.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.