MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102333

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction · 2022

Systematic external evaluation of four preoperative risk prediction models for severe postpartum hemorrhage in patients with placenta previa: A multicenter retrospective study.

Dang Xiaohe, Xiong Guoping, Fan Cuifang, He Yi, Sun Guoqiang, Wang Shaoshuai, Liu Yanyan, Zhang Li, Bao Yindi, Xu Jie, Du Hui, Deng Dongrui, Chen Suhua, Li Yuqi, Gong Xun, Wu Yuanyuan, Wu Jianli, Lin Xingguang, Qiao Fuyuan, Zeng Wanjiang, Feng Ling, Liu Haiyi

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To compare and evaluate the validity of the existing risk prediction models for severe postpartum hemorrhage (SPPH) in patients with placenta previa.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review to collect the existing risk prediction models for SPPH in patients with placenta previa, and recruited patients with placenta previa who underwent cesarean section in Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China) and 4 cooperative hospitals from January 2018 to June 2021. We defined SPPH as total blood loss ≥1500 mL or transfusion packed red blood cell ≥4 U. The risk of SPPH of each patient was predicted by the collected models, respectively. Then we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, coincidence rate (CCR), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and drawn the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve of each model.

RESULTS

This external cohort contained 1172 patients of whom 284 patients (24.23%) experienced SPPH, and 4 risk prediction models were collected in this study. After evaluated by this external cohort, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, CCR, PPV and NPV of the four models ranged from 0.644 to 0.755, 38.38% to 86.31%, 42.75% to 86.49%, 56.23% to 74.83%, 38.68% to 47.60%, 81.15% to 87.45%, respectively. The model established by Kim JW et al. had the highest sensitivity, NPV, AUC and net benefit, the model established by Lee JY et al. had the highest specificity, CCR and PPV.

CONCLUSIONS

The four prediction models showed moderate predictive performance, the discrimination indicators and benefit indicators of each model were not simultaneously ideal in this population. The prediction models should be further optimized to improve the discrimination ability and benefit, and prospective external validation studies should also be carried out before they are applied to clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Dang Xiaohe, Xiong Guoping, Fan Cuifang, He Yi, Sun Guoqiang, Wang Shaoshuai, Liu Yanyan, Zhang Li, Bao Yindi, Xu Jie, Du Hui, Deng Dongrui, Chen Suhua, Li Yuqi, Gong Xun, Wu Yuanyuan, Wu Jianli, Lin Xingguang, Qiao Fuyuan, Zeng Wanjiang, Feng Ling, Liu Haiyi. Systematic external evaluation of four preoperative risk prediction models for severe postpartum hemorrhage in patients with placenta previa: A multicenter retrospective study.. Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102333.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.