Exploring reference standards for the measurement of respiratory rate in children under 5 years of age: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND

Respiratory rate is an important part of assessing the clinical state of children, and various methods exist to measure it. However, there is a lack of a universally accepted reference standard to validate the performance of these methods.

AIM: To identify different reference standards that have been used to evaluate respiratory rate measurement methods in children under 5 years of age and describe their perceived strengths and limitations.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for studies in English. Studies of children under 5 years of age, published between 2013 and 2024, in which a method for measuring respiratory rate was compared against a reference standard, were included. Deductive content analysis was used to map perceived strengths and limitations of each standard, and a forest plot analysis was used to compare agreement between the reference standard and the index tests.

RESULTS

From 992 retrieved studies, 56 were included. The most common reference standard was impedance pneumography (22/56), primarily used in high-income settings, followed by manual counting (19/56), mostly employed in low- and middle-income settings, and capnography (9/56). Child age, clinical condition, setting, training of personnel and the ease of implementation were all important factors in which the reference standard was used and how it performed.

CONCLUSION

Three different reference standards were used for most studies; however, their relative performance to each other is unclear. There is a need for research that directly compares the performance of these reference standards across different age strata and settings in order to confidently recommend a reference standard for respiratory rate measurement methods.