Prenatal diagnosis · 2013
Strategy for managing maternal variant RHD alleles in Rhesus D negative obstetric populations during fetal RHD genotyping.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hyland Catherine A, Gardener Glenn J, O'Brien Helen, Millard Glenda, Gibbons Kristen, Tremellen Anne, Ochoa-Garay Gorka, Flower Robert L, Hyett Jonathan A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Fetal RHD screening programs that aim to reduce unnecessary antenatal anti-D prophylaxis are being introduced into clinical practice. Strategies to manage women serologically typed as Rhesus D negative who have maternal RHD variants are needed. This study describes maternal RHD allelic variants detected in nonselected and alloimmunised Rhesus D negative obstetric populations and explores a mathematical approach to identify these variants.
METHODS: Fetal RHD status was defined by testing cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Women at risk of an RHD variant were identified by selection for C and E haplotypes or by recognition of low polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold on fetal RHD typing. Maternal RHD alleles were defined by SNP profiling or sequencing.
RESULTS: The prevalence of RHD variants in nonselected and alloimmunised groups was 1% (6/603) and 5.5% (6/110), respectively (p < 0.001). An inverse association between RHD cycle threshold values and gestational age was described by a linear model (p < 0.001). Standard residual values with a Z score threshold of -3.00 would have detected all maternal variants with one (1/713) false positive.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of maternal RHD variants was significantly higher in alloimmunised cases. The causative mechanism for this needs further investigation. Mathematical modeling simplifies the detection of maternal RHD variants.
METHODS: Fetal RHD status was defined by testing cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma. Women at risk of an RHD variant were identified by selection for C and E haplotypes or by recognition of low polymerase chain reaction cycle threshold on fetal RHD typing. Maternal RHD alleles were defined by SNP profiling or sequencing.
RESULTS: The prevalence of RHD variants in nonselected and alloimmunised groups was 1% (6/603) and 5.5% (6/110), respectively (p < 0.001). An inverse association between RHD cycle threshold values and gestational age was described by a linear model (p < 0.001). Standard residual values with a Z score threshold of -3.00 would have detected all maternal variants with one (1/713) false positive.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of maternal RHD variants was significantly higher in alloimmunised cases. The causative mechanism for this needs further investigation. Mathematical modeling simplifies the detection of maternal RHD variants.