Evaluation of the Foot Arch in Partial Weightbearing Conditions.

BACKGROUND

Weightbearing plain radiography or computed tomography (CT) is used for diagnosis or treatment selection in foot disorders. This study compared foot alignment between full weightbearing (50% body weight [BW] per foot) plain radiography and nonweightbearing (0% BW) or partial weightbearing (10% BW per foot) CT scans.

METHODS

Subjects had both full (50% BW per foot) weightbearing plain radiographs and either a nonweightbearing (0% BW) or a partial weightbearing (20% BW or 10% BW per foot) CT scan. Feet (n = 89) had been previously classified as pes cavus (n = 14/17 [subjects/feet]), neutrally aligned (NA; 20/30), asymptomatic pes planus (APP; 18/24), and symptomatic pes planus (SPP; 15/18). Lateral talometatarsal angle (LTMA) and calcaneal pitch angle were compared between weightbearing radiography and maximum-intensity projection images generated from CT.

RESULTS

Significant differences in LTMA were found between nonweightbearing CT scans and full (50% BW per foot) weightbearing plain radiographs: the mean difference was 6.6 degrees in NA, 9.2 degrees in APP, and 11.3 degrees in SPP (P < .0001); no significant difference in LTMA was found for pes cavus. Although the interaction of foot type (P = .084) approached statistical significance, pairwise differences between 10% weightbearing and 50% weightbearing images by foot type were significant but small. The 50% weightbearing condition resulted in calcaneal pitch angles the same or slightly lower or higher than those of the 10% weightbearing and nonweightbearing images. LTMA and calcaneal pitch angle measurements made on full (50% BW per foot) weightbearing plain radiographs and non- (0%) or partial (10% BW per foot) weightbearing angles from CT scans were strongly correlated.

CONCLUSION

Different foot types have similar 2-dimensional sagittal plane morphologies with partial weightbearing (10% BW per foot) CT scans and, to a lesser degree, nonweightbearing (0%) neutral-position CT scans when compared to full weightbearing (50% BW per foot) plain radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case control study.