Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics · 2024
Three-dimensional imaging in craniofacial surgery: utilization of a novel 3D mobile application to evaluate the surgical outcomes of a skull recontouring procedure for cephalohematoma.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jung Geena, Buckner-Wolfson Emery, Reisert Hailey, Keymakh Margaret, Kim Timothy, Fatemi Ryan, Pasuizaca Andres, Shah Pushti, Cohen Joshua, Naseri Alavi Seyed Ahmad, Liriano Genesis, Kobets Andrew
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Cranial abnormalities are common birth defects that frequently alter skull shape and appearance. Despite their prevalence, objective quantification of defect severity pre- and posttreatment is limited. The authors evaluated the ability of MirrorMe3D, a novel 3D mobile iPhone application, to measure changes in the contour of the skull for patients undergoing contouring of a calcified cephalohematoma.
METHODS: The heads of two 20-month-old patients with disfiguring right parietal cephalohematomas undergoing a skull recontouring operation were scanned pre- and postsurgery. Four scans of the cranial abnormality were taken throughout the procedure and intraoperative 3D models were generated. Models of the head were overlapped pre- and postsurgery and compared using a depth analyzer built into MirrorMe3D.
RESULTS: Depth analysis revealed 6.0-mm and 9.9-mm differences for patients 1 and 2, respectively. Volume analysis revealed 33-cm3 and 85-cm3 differences for patients 1 and 2, respectively. Currently, no standard for quantitative measurement of the surgical outcomes of a skull reconstruction procedure exists.
CONCLUSIONS: MirrorMe3D provides an efficient method for monitoring patients with simple topographic scans that create accurate models of the head. The authors show the app's ability to capture the severity of a calcified cephalohematoma and quantify the changes in the contour of the skull before and after surgery.
METHODS: The heads of two 20-month-old patients with disfiguring right parietal cephalohematomas undergoing a skull recontouring operation were scanned pre- and postsurgery. Four scans of the cranial abnormality were taken throughout the procedure and intraoperative 3D models were generated. Models of the head were overlapped pre- and postsurgery and compared using a depth analyzer built into MirrorMe3D.
RESULTS: Depth analysis revealed 6.0-mm and 9.9-mm differences for patients 1 and 2, respectively. Volume analysis revealed 33-cm3 and 85-cm3 differences for patients 1 and 2, respectively. Currently, no standard for quantitative measurement of the surgical outcomes of a skull reconstruction procedure exists.
CONCLUSIONS: MirrorMe3D provides an efficient method for monitoring patients with simple topographic scans that create accurate models of the head. The authors show the app's ability to capture the severity of a calcified cephalohematoma and quantify the changes in the contour of the skull before and after surgery.