Predictive factors for vaginal delivery in pregnant women with previous cesarean section: a case-control study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To identify factors that predict the likelihood of a successful vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC).
METHODS
An observational, case-control study was conducted at Hospital das Clínicas, Botucatu Medical School, a tertiary referral center in Brazil. Medical records of women with singleton term pregnancies, one previous cesarean section, and a live fetus in cephalic presentation who delivered between January 2013 and December 2015 were reviewed. Participants were classified according to delivery mode: vaginal birth after cesarean section or repeat cesarean section. Maternal demographics, clinical and obstetric characteristics, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Associations were assessed using chi-square, and significant variables were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model.
RESULTS
A total of 653 women met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 324(49.6%) achieved a vaginal birth, and 329(50.4%) underwent a repeat cesarean section. Factors associated with a higher likelihood of vaginal birth included a history of prior vaginal delivery, cervical dilation of at least 4 cm at admission, a Bishop score of 6 or higher, spontaneous onset of labor, absence of chronic hypertension, and neonates classified as appropriate or small for gestational age. In contrast, advanced maternal age, unemployment, diabetes, and hypertensive disorders were associated with an increased likelihood of cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSION
VBAC was more likely in women with cervical dilation of 4 cm or more at admission, a Bishop score of 6 or higher, a history of vaginal birth, spontaneous labor onset, absence of chronic hypertension, and lower neonatal birth weight.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.