Mikrobiyoloji bulteni · 2009
[Retrospective evaluation of the cases with Candida famata fungemia in a burn unit].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Turunç Tuba, Demiroğlu Y Ziya, Alişkan Hikmet, Colakoğlu Sule, Arslan Hande
Аннотация
The prevalence of fungemia due to non-albicans Candida species is increasing currently. However, there is no reported case of fungemia due to Candida famata in a burn unit. This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics and outcomes of seven burn patients with fungemia due to C. famata. The study included a total of 410 burn patients followed-up during January 2003-January 2006. Six of the patients (85.7%) were males and one was female (14.3%), with a mean age of 22.2 years. Mean total body surface area of the burns was 39.2% (24%-64%), flame being the most frequent cause of the burns (n= 4), followed by hot water (n= 2) and electroshock (n= 1). Six of the cases had central venous catheter and in 5 of these catheter-associated bacteremia had developed before the establishment of candidemia. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n= 5) was the most frequent cause of bacteremia; Escherichia coil being isolated from a patient with urinary tract infection and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a patient with wound infection. All patients had received treatment with systemic antibiotics prior to the development of the C. famata episode. C. famata was detected from the blood cultures of the patients, however, the wound swabs were negative in terms of C. famata growth. The isolates were defined according to their negative germ tube test and their carbohydrate assimilation profile in API 20 C AUX (BioMerieux, France). Since the environmental cultures yielded negative results for C. famata, the infections were thought to be derived from cross contamination. Once a positive blood culture for C. famata was obtained, the catheter was removed, and treatment with liposomal amphotericin-B was implemented. Presence of a central venous catheter and prior antibiotic therapy seem to be the predisposing factors in the development of fungemia due to C. famata. Thus, when fungemia due to C. famata is established, central venous catheter should be removed and amphotericin-B therapy should be implemented promptly.