Adjunctive Use of Cenobamate in Paediatric Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Real-World, Single-Centre Experience.
Аннотация
Background/
Objectives
Epilepsy represents one of the most common chronic neurological disorders in children, with a considerable proportion of patients exhibiting resistance to pharmacotherapy despite the advent of novel antiseizure medications (ASMs) in recent decades. This retrospective study assesses the off-label administration of cenobamate-a newly approved antiseizure medication (ASM) for focal seizures in adults-in a cohort of paediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy at a single neurology centre.
Methods
Clinical outcomes were reviewed retrospectively for 18 children who received cenobamate for at least 6 months.
Results
Eighteen paediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy received cenobamate therapy at a neurology centre. The mean age was 164.6 months, and each patient had previously trialled an average of 8.7 antiseizure medications. During a follow-up period of up to 29 months, 39% of participants achieved complete seizure freedom, while five additional patients experienced a seizure reduction exceeding 80%. Concomitant clobazam use was common among the cohort. Adverse events were reported in 78% of patients, predominantly somnolence, though these were generally transient or manageable. One patient developed a temporary exacerbation of seizures, which resolved following a dosage adjustment. Many patients were able to reduce or discontinue other ASMs during the observation period.
Conclusions
Cenobamate demonstrated acceptable tolerability in this paediatric cohort, and seizure improvements were observed in a subset of patients. Further clinical trials are warranted to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of cenobamate in this patient population.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.