The management of pectus excavatum in pediatric patients: a narrative review.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE
Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital chest wall anomaly, the hallmark of which is the caved-in appearance of the anterior chest. A growing body of literature exists surrounding methods of surgical correction, though considerable variability in management remains. The primary objectives of this review are to outline the current practices surrounding the care of pediatric patients with pectus excavatum and present emerging trends in the field that continue to impact the care of these patients.
METHODS
Published material in English was identified utilizing the PubMed database using multiple combinations of the keywords: pectus excavatum, pediatric, management, complications, minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum, MIRPE, surgery, repair, and vacuum bell. Articles from 2000-2022 were emphasized, though older literature was included when historically relevant.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: This review highlights contemporary management principles of pectus excavatum in the pediatric population, comprising preoperative evaluation, surgical and non-surgical treatment, postoperative considerations including pain control, and monitoring strategies.
CONCLUSIONS
In addition to providing an overview of pectus excavatum management, this review highlights areas that remain controversial including the physiologic effects of the deformity and the optimal surgical approach, which invite future research efforts. This review also features updated content on non-invasive monitoring and treatment approaches such as three-dimensional (3D) scanning and vacuum bell therapy, which may alter the treatment landscape for pectus excavatum in order to reduce radiation exposure and invasive procedures when able.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.