MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/fampra/cmh121

Медицинская библиотека · Family practice · 2004

Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines.

Hamilton William, Sharp Deborah

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is common, causing approximately 11% of cancer deaths in the UK. However, a GP would only expect to see one new presentation each year. Referral guidelines outlining clinical scenarios of high risk have been published. These aim to help GPs select patients for rapid investigation.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to review the presenting features of colorectal cancer in primary care, using the basic structure of the UK Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer.

METHODS

A structured literature review was carried out.

RESULTS

Two symptoms have a high predictive value for cancer: rectal bleeding and change in bowel habit towards increased looseness or increased stool frequency. Other symptoms, such as abdominal pain, are so prevalent in the community that they have little predictive value. There is little published evidence on abdominal or rectal masses and iron deficiency anaemia as presenting features for colorectal cancer. However, these are so likely to have an important cause, investigation is mandated. Two areas in the Referral Guidelines are questioned: the need to defer investigation of change in bowel habit towards increased looseness or increased stool frequency for 6 weeks, and the low risk nature of constipation.

CONCLUSION

The Referral Guidelines have a reasonable evidence base.

Для цитирования: Hamilton William, Sharp Deborah. Diagnosis of colorectal cancer in primary care: the evidence base for guidelines.. Family practice. 2004. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmh121.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.