Acta ortopedica mexicana · 2020
[Comparison of surgical techniques for rotator cuff injury: cost-result].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Velasco-Alcázar R, Rojas-Sosa M C, Navarro-López M G, Ibáñez-Galicia M, Chávez-Covarrubias G, Olvera-Gómez J L, Pérez-Atanasio J M
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Currently, to manage rotator cuff injury (RCI), there is a tendency to replace mini-open (MO) surgery with arthroscopy, but results and costs are controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-result of surgical techniques for RCI.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A partial economic evaluation of cost-result type was performed on 113 patients with RCI surgically operated by mini-open technique (n = 6), or arthroscopy (n = 91), or both (n = 16). Direct costs included: hospital stay, days of work disability, surgery, implants (anchors), medical assessments, laboratory and imaging. One-year shoulder functionality was evaluated with Constant-Murley scale (EscC-M).
RESULTS: The MO technique was the most economical (X = $42,950.60 MXN) and the most expensive was the arthroscopy + MO with anchors (X = $89,594.80 MXN); with a non-significant difference in shoulder functionality (EscC-M = 56.33 ± 7.0 vs. 64.25 ± 9.0 points, respectively) (p 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis; post hoc Mann-Whitney). Difference of $46,644.1 MXN between techniques corresponded to 7.92 points. There was a mild relationship between the technique and the functionality of shoulder (rs = 0.26; p = 0.005; Spearman).
CONCLUSION: The mini-open technique showed best cost-result, with similar functionality in shoulder to that obtained with the more expensive technique.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the cost-result of surgical techniques for RCI.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A partial economic evaluation of cost-result type was performed on 113 patients with RCI surgically operated by mini-open technique (n = 6), or arthroscopy (n = 91), or both (n = 16). Direct costs included: hospital stay, days of work disability, surgery, implants (anchors), medical assessments, laboratory and imaging. One-year shoulder functionality was evaluated with Constant-Murley scale (EscC-M).
RESULTS: The MO technique was the most economical (X = $42,950.60 MXN) and the most expensive was the arthroscopy + MO with anchors (X = $89,594.80 MXN); with a non-significant difference in shoulder functionality (EscC-M = 56.33 ± 7.0 vs. 64.25 ± 9.0 points, respectively) (p 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis; post hoc Mann-Whitney). Difference of $46,644.1 MXN between techniques corresponded to 7.92 points. There was a mild relationship between the technique and the functionality of shoulder (rs = 0.26; p = 0.005; Spearman).
CONCLUSION: The mini-open technique showed best cost-result, with similar functionality in shoulder to that obtained with the more expensive technique.