American journal of translational research · 2022
Application of obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators in continuous quality improvement.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Luo Liu, Wang Longqiong, Zhang Min, Liao Bizhen
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To verify the effect of obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators for continuously improving nursing quality.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the obstetric nurse quality in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from October 2019 to September 2020. Nurses and patients in the Obstetrics Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were respectively assigned into an experimental group and a control group. High-quality nursing services were provided to patients in both groups. In addition to the high-quality nursing services, the obstetric nurses in the experimental group received training on obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators based on the knowledge-attitude-practice model. An obstetric nursing quality evaluation was conducted between the two groups. Continuous quality improvement was achieved using the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle. The nursing quality was reflected by 14 obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators and the nurses' job satisfaction was compared between the experimental group and the control group before and after intervention.
RESULTS: The information regarding the nurses and parturients, and the nurses' job satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05). Except for information regarding the lateral perineotomy at vaginal delivery, there was no significant difference in other obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators between the two groups before the intervention. In the experimental group, the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction after intervention were better than before (P<0.05). In the experimental group, the rates of neonatal asphyxia/severe neonatal asphyxia and postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery after intervention was significantly lower than before (P<0.05). The experimental group had better outcomes than the control group in the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators can be used to improve the nursing quality in continuous quality improvement, which is worthy of promotion in clinics.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the obstetric nurse quality in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from October 2019 to September 2020. Nurses and patients in the Obstetrics Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University and University-Town Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were respectively assigned into an experimental group and a control group. High-quality nursing services were provided to patients in both groups. In addition to the high-quality nursing services, the obstetric nurses in the experimental group received training on obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators based on the knowledge-attitude-practice model. An obstetric nursing quality evaluation was conducted between the two groups. Continuous quality improvement was achieved using the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle. The nursing quality was reflected by 14 obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators and the nurses' job satisfaction was compared between the experimental group and the control group before and after intervention.
RESULTS: The information regarding the nurses and parturients, and the nurses' job satisfaction were not significantly different between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05). Except for information regarding the lateral perineotomy at vaginal delivery, there was no significant difference in other obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators between the two groups before the intervention. In the experimental group, the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction after intervention were better than before (P<0.05). In the experimental group, the rates of neonatal asphyxia/severe neonatal asphyxia and postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery after intervention was significantly lower than before (P<0.05). The experimental group had better outcomes than the control group in the rates of early skin-to-skin contact between mothers and infants, early sucking with exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization, parturient satisfaction with the nurses' work, and nurses' job satisfaction (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Obstetric nursing-sensitive quality indicators can be used to improve the nursing quality in continuous quality improvement, which is worthy of promotion in clinics.