MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105937

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of equine veterinary science · 2026

Comparison of cost for conventional embryo transfer versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Squires E L, Ferris R

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There are obvious practical advantages of both conventional ET and ICSI. One question that has not been addressed adequately, however, is the relative cost of each procedure and if there is a cost advantage of one over the other.

AIMS/

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the present study was to obtain additional cost data from clinics and breeding farms that perform both ET and ICSI.

METHODS

A request was sent to 10 clinics that performed either just OPU or OPU/ICSI. These facilities were representative of reproductive specialists located all across the United States. Six clinics provided information on at least 10 ICSI and 10 ET mares.

RESULTS

In 3/6 clinics the cost of generating an embryo by ICSI was less than the cost of generating an embryo by uterine flushing, nearly the same in one clinic and more than double the cost of generating ICSI embryos in 2 clinics.

CONCLUSION

The cost of ICSI embryos can be similar to that for ET embryos if one considers the extra embryos produced by ICSI that are vitrified and stored for transfer at a later time and the facility is producing at least 2.5 embryos/OPU. The client should take into consideration all the factors and then choose the technique that best meets their needs.

Для цитирования: Squires E L, Ferris R. Comparison of cost for conventional embryo transfer versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection.. Journal of equine veterinary science. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105937.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.